Submit your article of up to 500 words in length, subject to editing for clarity and brevity (please note: I run only original articles that have not appeared on any Web site or in any publication and I can’t use anything that looks like a commercial pitch). I’ll use a phony name for you unless you tell me otherwise. Thanks for sharing!
First Impressions of the iPad in Healthcare
By Trey Lauderdale
I don’t think we have ever seen a piece of technology as polarizing as the recently released Apple iPad. Being vice president of innovation at a healthcare-focused iPhone development company, I have received an unbelievable amount of feedback (some solicited, some not) on the good, the bad, and the ugly of the iPad’s potential uses in healthcare.
The first potential use models are the usual suspects we have all been hearing about for the last 3-6 months: entering data into the EMR, viewing medical images, observing patient data, managing alarms and alerts, etc, etc, etc. I could go on and on, but you already know all of these because they are available right now on your iPhone.
Don’t get me wrong — all of these functions are wonderful, but nothing here is really game-changing. I consider these the foundation of what is necessary to bring this device into healthcare in a useful manner.
In my opinion, the greatest impact this platform will have on healthcare is going to be from the creative juices squeezed out of the developer’s minds who will be writing applications specifically geared for the iPad and its potential use model.
You have got to look beyond version 1.0 of the iPad and into what it will become in the second, third, and onward generations of the device / platform. Apple tends to make significant improvements to their product between the first and second generation releases (2nd Gen iPhone >> 1st Gen iPhone). The limitations that have been brought up are all valid, but will be alleviated over time or through simple physical remedies.
It won’t survive in the hospital environment?
A robust, antimicrobial case will be out by the end of 2010 – it can almost be guaranteed.
No camera for image taking?
It will be there by Gen 2 (not for healthcare, but because consumers want it).
Too big to fit in a pocket?
The workflow model should not position this as an “always carried” device.
The one limitation that had me on the verge of throwing my MacBook across the office was the lack of background processing. While potentially the greatest shortcoming of the iPad, after some thought and analysis, it needs to be viewed as a mixed blessing. This device is going to have 1GHz of processing power focused on ONE application. The user experience in the currently open application is going to be amazing, assuming developers take time to re-factor their applications to fully leverage this “limitation.”
Through appropriate use of inter-app communication and data sharing, a great deal of the concerns brought on by no backgrounding can be bridged relatively easily. The key is going to be the foundational applications leveraging and creating open-source frameworks and standards that can be leveraged across multiple vendors in a collaborative environment.
The first day the iPad is released in March, all of the technology and applications are in place to enable a caregiver to view their patient’s vital monitoring waveform (Airstrip Technology), check the data against their EMR (Epic Haiku), and then send a quick message to an appropriate staff member asking them to take action on a potential event (Voalté).
While these currently reside as three separate applications, the experience provided to the end-user should not feel as such. The real power of the iPad (and even iPhone) platform is going to be a collaborative environment between the vendors that reside on the device. This collaboration will be of even greater importance with the iPad due to the greater amount of real estate the end user has to work with.
I can envision a hospital where an iPad is placed outside every hospital room displaying relevant information about the patient and their current vitals (REALLY decentralized monitoring). Clinicians grab the iPad as they enter the room, sign in with a quick series of hand gestures (or maybe take a quick picture of their ID?), and easily enter information into the open application regarding the patient’s current status. Messages and tasks can be dispatched to the right caregiver automatically from the iPad, and the clinician places the device back into the cradle once done with the patient. All of the pieces for this experience are currently in-place and ready to be tied together.
Apple has provided the revolutionary platform we could have only dreamed of 10 years ago. It is now our responsibility as application developers and IT system administrators to turn those dreams into reality and provide the end user experience our clinicians deserve.
Trey Lauderdale is vice president of innovation of Voalté of Sarasota, FL.
Interim is not Final
By Mountain Man
I don’t know about you, but my organization is asking a lot of questions about ARRA "now that it is finalized" and what we as an organization should do. Should we change our strategic plan?
With all the hype and media around this pseudo-event, we certainly have the the eyes and ears of our executive team and board members. We have somewhat of a bully pulpit. We should use the awareness created to advance our causes of bringing safety and efficiencies to healthcare delivery and financial visibility into the business. If we can tilt the spending towards an appropriate amount in order to complete our strategic plan, we should do so.
Here is the problem. “Interim” is defined by Wikipedia as “a temporary pause in a line of succession or event.” This does not sound very FINAL to me. So, Interim Final Rule really makes little sense.
Quit freaking out, people. NO ONE thinks we can hit the dates provided by the IFR. We should not reallocate all our resources to cover some part of the ARRA requirements that we left out of our strategic plans two years ago.
Most of us are working towards the general direction that the IFR is leading us. Keep doing what you are doing. Trust your plan and execute.
It is your STRATEGIC plan for a reason. Hitting an INTERIM suggested state is very TACTICAL and short-sighted.
If you are not headed in that general direction by now, then you should freak out.
They’re all Synonyms!
By Deborah Kohn
I don’t know how many times I delivered a presentation / authored a published article when I had to explain why two healthcare information technology (HIT) trade organizations (one so large that it won’t be mentioned in this article and the other, federally commissioned at taxpayer expense and no longer in existence) adopted definition differences between an electronic medical record (EMR) and an electronic health record (EHR).
This only further confused my healthcare professional audience / readership who, for years, have had a complete understanding that charts, records, patient charts, patient records, medical records, health records, etc. are synonyms! Walk into any hospital or clinician office and always one will hear an assortment of such synonyms without ever questioning the meanings.
True, in the late 20th century, synonyms of adjectives, such as computer, computerized, automated, or electronic were needed to differentiate between (what is known in the greater IT world as) analog vs. digital charts, records, patient charts, patient records, medical records, health records, etc. However, still the use of the synonyms of adjectives with the synonyms of nouns made no difference to practicing healthcare professionals, except to differentiate, when necessary, between analog, digital, or hybrid.
Thankfully, we might be getting close to ending this nonsense. Recently, one HIStalk reader correctly pointed out that NOWHERE in the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) with its Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act is there a distinction made between an EMR and an EHR. Only the term electronic health record and acronym EHR is used — for health information exchanges, for hospitals, for physician offices. That’s probably because every healthcare industry-bred author / reader / interpreter of this legislation has a complete understanding of what is being conveyed.
On the floors or in clinic rooms, let’s continue to use whatever synonyms (adjectives and nouns) come to mind, because we’ll continue to understand what is being communicated. In addition, let’s give credit to the 2009 legislation for dealing one of the final blows to this “trade organization made up EHR/EMR” definition debate and all agree to use EHR (as used in the ARRA / HITECH legislation) as the standard terminology in presentations / published articles / vendor products, etc. Only then will we be able to move on to more important discussions.
Deborah Kohn is a principal with Dak Systems Consulting of San Mateo, CA.
Licensing of EHR Systems: Contractual Considerations
By Robert Doe, JD
As a result of the incentive payments offered under the HITECH Act for implementing certain qualifying EHR systems, many healthcare entities are evaluating the various EHR systems that are available, taking into account the certification, interoperability, and meaningful use requirements. There are a number of considerations a healthcare organization should take into account during the process of choosing and contracting with an EHR vendor.
A healthcare organization should consider including certain warranties and representations in the agreement with the EHR vendor to help ensure that the system is capable of allowing the healthcare organization to receive the incentives (and avoid future penalties) associated with the adoption of an EHR on an ongoing basis for the term of the license. As a drafter and negotiator of license agreements on behalf of healthcare organizations, while some vendors claim to do so, I have seen reluctance on the part of EHR vendors to meaningfully warranty their systems with regard to these considerations.
One argument is that the criteria for receiving the incentive payments have not been clearly defined. Future requirements, the argument goes, could conceivably require significant investment in new functionality. In addition, a vendor may argue that it has no control over how the system is actually used within the healthcare organization.
With regard to the first argument, EHR vendors are receiving significant new business as a result of the HITECH Act. If they cannot warrant the functionality which is one of the main motivating factors for licensing the particular system chosen, they are in effect transferring the entire risk to the healthcare organization, which, at a minimum, should be shared by the parties. For a significant capital expenditure of this nature, care should be taken to produce the result which justifies the expenditure. As a result, this should be one of the first discussions a healthcare organization should have with the EHR vendor during contract negotiations.
Some vendors may offer warranty language that appears to address the subject matter, but from a legal perspective, doesn’t actually provide much in the way of legal rights. Some vendors may propose that the issue be addressed as part of maintenance and support. Keep in mind that the legal remedies may be significantly less for a breach of maintenance and support as opposed to a breach of warranty. The warranty language could also be crafted to take into account the situation where significant additional investment is required for the system to conform to HITECH’s requirements, allocating an agreed upon portion of the expense to the existing customer base.
With regard to the second argument, it’s true the vendor has no control over how the system is actually used by the healthcare organization, but the warranty language can be worded to ensure the system includes the necessary functionality to allow the healthcare organization to qualify for incentive payments and avoid future penalties.
In addition, many healthcare organizations are endeavoring to provide access to their EHR systems to other unrelated healthcare organization in their communities, as part of a regional health information organization, health information exchange, or otherwise. The underlying goal of many of these arrangements is to provide EHR technology to other local healthcare facilities that may not be able to afford such systems by themselves. Such arrangements may also help to lesson the financial burden. Whatever the reason, there are legal and licensing issues to consider.
Any healthcare organization that desires to provide access to a software application to another unrelated healthcare entity or clinician must be aware of the physician self referral prohibition (Section 1877 of the Social Security Act) commonly known as the Stark law, the federal anti-kickback statute, and, depending on the data being exchanged, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, commonly known as HIPAA. In addition, significant anti-trust issues could arise if the software allows the sublicensees to share financial information. These additional legal issues must be addressed with legal counsel prior to setting up such an access arrangement.
In addition, the agreement with the EHR vendor must contain specific provisions allowing the healthcare organization to provide access to the unrelated healthcare organization. Do not assume that you can provide access by simply executing the EHR vendor’s standard form license agreement. All license agreements contain a license grant section that specifies the parties and individuals that can use the software. In most instances, it is limited to employees of the legal entity that signs the contract.
In addition, most license agreements specifically prohibit the use of the software to process information for, or use the software on the behalf of, any third party. The contractual language allowing the healthcare organization to provide access to an unrelated organization can take many forms. It may be as simple as expanding the definition of an authorized software user to include any other individuals authorized to use the software. Alternatively, the license grant may specifically state that the licensee may sublicense or provide access to the software application to a third party and set forth the conditions under which it can do so. There will also need to be an agreement between the two healthcare organizations governing access to and use of the EHR system. Careful consideration should be put into the drafting of this document. There are a number of issues that could arise if not addressed in this agreement.
The HITECH Act incentives have increased demand for EHR systems. Often times the timeframe for implementing such systems is quicker than would ordinarily be the case. It has been my experience that taking the time now to address the legal and business issues will help avoid problems in the future.
Bob Doe is a founding member of BSSD, an information technology law firm located in Minneapolis, MN.
From Nasty Parts: “Re: Sage. COO Lindy Benton resigned Thursday night.” Confirmed with Sage. Betty Otter-Nickerson starts as CEO this week.
From iSOFTen: “Re: UM Medical Centre in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. IBA/iSOFT have been invited to the exit door because of repeated product delivery failures. This casts long shadows over the future of their German-developed strategic lab product, planned for the still pending at Welsh procurement. And with regard to iSOFT’s alliance with Picis, it was because of IBA/iSOFTS’s product delivery failures.” Unverified.
Listening: Midlake, a Texas band that sounds like accessible, straightforward 60s pop meets the Flaming Lips.
I think it’s plainly obvious, but in case not: I use only phony names on the reader comments I post. Please do not pester your colleagues just because the phony name is similar to theirs since it most likely wasn’t their comment.
Tammi, our BFF from AT&T Mobility, said their “iPhone in Medicine” session was packed even after being moved to a larger room at the mHealth conference in Washington DC last week. mHealth Initiative is the group formed by former Medical Records Institute/TEPR people Peter Waegemann and Claudia Tessier when that group flamed out.
Weird News Andy ponders, “Where do babies come from? From iPhones, apparently.” After four years of trying to conceive, a couple hits pay dirt in just two months after using an iPhone menstrual calculator. Thank goodness humanity didn’t lapse into extinction before the iPhone came along to help it reproduce the species.
Yale New Haven Hospital chooses the document management solution of Perceptive Software for several departments.
The folks at Henry Schein Practice Solutions are offering a free, on-demand Webinar called 10 Questions to Ask your Electronic Dental Record Vendor. They’ve also hired Pete Cousins as national sales manager for Dentrix Enterprise. I’m sensing trouble because Pete is a big-time amateur golfer, which means if you want a customer’s game, he will probably thrash you despite his best intentions to keep it close.
Red Hat announces its February 10 Open Source Cloud Computing Forum, an all-day virtual forum hosted by its CTO that offers 12 half-hour technical presentations.
Sunquest will introduce its new BI solutions and physician portal at HIMSS.
We’ve mentioned some charity-related activities at HIMSS, so here’s one from Compuware and Covisint. The company will donate $10 to Habitat for Humanity for each attendee badge scan at their booth. It will also raffle off a $5,000 contribution to that same organization, which is the amount of money it takes to rehabilitate a home.
I guess Google can celebrate its big win over Microsoft in their respective HIStalk reader polls, with Google’s 65% negative rating in healthcare beating Microsoft’s 66%. New poll to your right, the last in the series: same question, this time about Cisco.
It’s that time of year again — please complete my HIStalk Reader Survey, won’t you? I read the response carefully and plan the whole next year based in what readers tell me, so your time won’t be wasted. Thanks.
This is the real payoff of EMRs, described in a well-written article in The Buffalo News. Buffalo Medical Group searches its database for patients at risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm. It identifies 2,000, of which 30 are found to have aneurysms that could burst at any time, which is nearly a certain death sentence. The article focuses on the benefits of the medical home concept, but also summarizes the concerns of its critics: “They also wonder if the concept is nothing more than a repackaging of managed care, bristle at the suggestion that doctors need financial incentives to do the right thing, and view the focus on efficiency as more appropriate for a factory.”
I don’t know about your hospital, but mine can’t give H1N1 vaccine away. I said early on that this latest scare might be as overblown as the Gerald Ford’s Great Swine Flu Epidemic of 1976, although I really doubted that. Other than putting some nice profits in the pockets of drug companies and McKesson, I’m struggling to decide if there was any benefit to getting everybody all worked up about it. It’s notoriously tough to predict pandemics, much less prevent them.
Kaiser Permanente is recognized with a security award from HITRUST, an organization that has a Kaiser security executive on its executive council. I Googled to see if HITRUST is a for-profit corporation as I expected; the only declaration I found saying it’s a non-profit came from Fierce Health IT, which I think is wrong. It looks to me like a regular business, despite a .net Web address and some noble mission statements. Its Web site says it is a “private, independent company” and its Texas incorporation records show its officers as a husband and wife. He’s founded a few other now-defunct corporately sponsored think tanks in the past.
An Epocrates survey finds that 20% of doctors say they’ll be buying an iPad within a year, good news for the company since it has already committed to creating an iPad version of its drug information software.
VirtualHealth Technologies completes the sale of its Secure eHealth secure messaging business and its VPS Holdings prescription drug monitoring business to Wound Management Technologies.That leaves the company with two primary business lines: EMRs and gold mines (insert joke here).
St. Joseph’s Hospital (WV) chooses eWebHIM from eWebHealth for scanning and HIM workflow.
Akron General jumps on the “show your ED wait times” bandwagon, putting them on its Web site and on billboards. The times reflect how long it takes for the doctor to see you, but most ED delays involve waiting for technicians, for labs or x-rays to come back, or for someone to get you signed out with prescriptions. Being called from the waiting area to the treatment room is only a small victory. Since they’re capturing the times from their EMR anyway, maybe they should measure arrival time to final disposition.
eClinical Works breaks the $100 million per year revenue barrier. I dug out my May 2006 interview with Girish Kumar Navani in which he boldly predicted $40 million in revenue for that year, a big jump from the previous year’s $25 million. And when I interviewed him in early 2008, they were at $60 million and he was predicting $500 million in annual revenue by 2018.
GE Healthcare names William Denman as chief medical officer. He’s coming over from Covidien, the Irish spinoff of Tyco Brands that sells healthcare products under the brands Kendall, Mallinckrodt, Puritan Bennett, and Syneture, among others.
Results look promising for the first-generation artificial pancreas for treatment of diabetes. It combines a blood glucose monitor with an insulin pump, creating a feedback loop that is managed by software.
The VA is budgeting $157 million next year to develop a Virtual Lifetime Electronic Record that will tie together data from the VA, DoD, and the private sector. DoD plans to spend $300 million to develop its part of the project. In more startling news, the VA will spend $347 million for HealtheVet, which it says is the “the future foundation of our electronic health record system” that will initially include a new clinical data repository, patient scheduling system, and pharmacy information system. On the VA’s VistA Web page, it calls HealtheVet “the VA’s next generation of VistA.” I never heard what happened with all those ambitious plans to replace VistA with commercial systems, so I don’t know where this money is going.
Sun’s big executives, including co-founder Scott McNealy, quit as the company is absorbed into Oracle. McNealy gave the opening address at HIMSS 2005 in Dallas. I don’t recall being impressed.
Odd lawsuit: a stripper gets drunk on the job and leaves the club despite its three attempts to stop her. She crashes her car, breaking her nose and back. Her injuries force her to stop stripping, so she sues the strip club for “wantonness.” The jury awards her $100,000, with her attorney declaring that “I think that it does speak to our community’s regard for safety”. The club’s lawyer disagrees: “Bottom line is she got herself drunk, had a terrible wreck, and wants someone else to pay for it.”
E-mail me.
Scott Weingarten, MD, MPH is president and CEO of Zynx Health.
What was your reaction when you saw the proposed Meaningful Use criteria?
When you look at what was published on December 30, I don’t think there were any huge surprises based on what we saw over the summer that was published in June and July. There was a continued focus on clinical decision support, which we anticipated based on the earlier information. We believe that that is a good thing.
We think clinical decision support can lead to improved quality and safety of care, as well as less costly care. We believe that’s where the greatest benefit will occur as a result of the investment in healthcare information technology. We were pleased to see that clinical decision support remain prominently featured in the December 30 publications.
Do you think the requirement to create five clinical decision support rules is a good step toward using systems to guide physicians?
I do. Initially, I believe it was one. Now it’s five. I think the bar is still very low for clinical support rules. I think in order to get the clinical return on investment and the cost benefits that the federal government would like to achieve, I think they’re going to need more than five, but I think it’s a good start.
To many doctors, when they hear clinical decision support, their experience or their perception is that it’s just intrusive, unhelpful, impersonal warnings that stop them from doing what they want to do. What has to be done to turn that into that vision of having it impact quality and cost?
They have to look carefully at both the sensitivity and the specificity of the clinical decision support, meaning, look at very carefully that there are as few false positives as possible. I think at least historically, largely with drug/drug interactions, there are many false positive alerts that in many cases can color our view about the value of clinical decision support.
When one goes beyond drug/drug alerts and really looks at the broader potential for clinical decision support, and if one really focuses on those aspects of care that provide great clinical benefit… For example, evidence-based clinical processes that have been shown to reduce mortality, reduce morbidity, and improve quality of life or safely reduce costs when one pays careful attention to the specificity, or ensuring that there are as few false positives as possible. I think the annoyance factor will go down and I think the benefits will increase.
Do you think it’s the content provider or the application vendor who needs to refine that sensitivity/specificity and the ultimate presentation of whatever the result was?
I think that it’s really teamwork. When I say teamwork or collaboration, I think the content vendor needs to really give a lot of thought to optimizing the sensitivity and specificity of the clinical decision support. I think the healthcare information technology supplier needs to have the functionality to optimize the specificity and sensitivity of clinical decisions.
Also the client, in some cases, can pick and choose which components of clinical decisions support that they would like to utilize. Thinking about the benefits, or them really analyzing the potential benefits of turning on clinical decision support, should occur before they select what form of clinical decision support.
A good example, as you mentioned earlier, would be the five rules. Making sure that the five rules are those that really will favorably impact care at their organization, have the greatest clinical benefit, and yet the rules will be as specific as possible.
One of the things that it seemed was fairly clear in the initial proposed criteria was that the rules needed to be user-maintainable rather than just a black box that you take as they come. Was that a surprise?
No, I think you want them to be maintained by the user because I think that different organizations, depending on local practice, there’ll be some rules that provide greater benefit than at other organizations.
Let me give you an example of what I mean. Let’s say an organization has already achieved the ceiling effect and eligible patients with chronic heart failure are being treated with either an ACE inhibitor or an ARB. Well, having a rule will provide very little benefit, just because the care is consistent with best practice or evidence-based practice. Another organization where they have not achieved those benefits, where far fewer appropriate patients are treated with ACE inhibitors or ARBs for chronic heart failure, may have an opportunity to save many lives by providing that rule.
Really, the point being that different organizations will achieve different benefits with different types of clinical decision support, depending on the size of the gap between optimal or evidence-based practice in their current practice. Practice varies, as I think has been very well described, organization to organization. Therefore, I think having the user select which clinical decision support rules have the potential to provide the greatest benefit for their organization, and potentially maintaining the information, to me, makes sense.
When hospital-based vs. practice-based doctors create their initial five rules, how will their priorities differ?
I think that the types of rules that are likely to be created in the ambulatory setting or by physicians in their offices will reflect the patterns of outpatient care. My guess is we will see a number of alerts and rules for chronic illness in the form of disease management rules or preventive care; where I think the rules will be quite different in the hospital, which will reflect acute illness requiring hospitalization.
My guess is in the ambulatory setting, we might see more rules related to chronic illnesses such as asthma or diabetes. In the hospital, we might see more rules and alerts that relate to the more common reasons why patients hospitalize, such as chronic heart failure or community acquired pneumonia.
What do you think about rules for nurses when charting or documenting?
There’s a fair amount of nursing practice that can be evidence-based. There are many good studies showing that certain nursing practices, when faithfully adhered to, will lead to better patient outcomes than other nursing practices.
Decades of nursing research support what processes are best for patients, and I think it makes a lot of sense to have rules and alerts to inform nurses, when appropriate. That will lead to the best possible nursing care. I would agree with that. I think alerts and rules are just as important for nurses as they are for physicians and other healthcare providers.
What kind of work has been done, or what kind of interest is there in background alerts based on collecting electronic data that indicate problems, the imminent harm type of rule?
My guess is that the initial rules may not be quite that sophisticated, but I think there’s tremendous benefit that can occur when these background rules — for example, will identify patients based on physiologic parameters, hemodynamic variables where they’re at risk of rapid clinical deterioration — to alert the physician to observe the patient closely and possibly prescribe new treatments.
I think that when we get there — when the field matures, when we’re consistently applying those rules — I think there’s great potential to quickly identify problems that may not have been identified by treating clinicians and to reduce morbidity and mortality. I think in the not-so-distant future there will be many more of those rules, and that will advance patient care significantly.
What advice would you give to hospitals, in general, about creation and maintenance of order sets?
I think it’s hard. One is I would advise them to create, update, and maintain order sets. There are good data in the scientific, peer-reviewed literature that shows that evidence-based order sets reduce mortality, reduce morbidity, and can safely reduce costs. I would advise hospitals to do it.
Second, is there are data showing that physician productivity can be increased when physicians use order sets for common diagnosis rather than write each order one by one. There’s the benefit of improving care and potentially improving productivity, but I think you need the order sets to be viewed as credible by the medical and nursing staff.
They have to be updated frequently. I think they have to be evidence-based. I think if they are not maintained and the information is highly perishable, that when the information goes out of date clinicians are smart and figure it out. They say, “Hey, how come this order set doesn’t reflect the findings in this article published in the New England Journal of Medicine a month ago? What’s going on here? Don’t we want to provide the best possible care to our patients?”
Clinicians, appropriately, can be critical when information in order sets is out of date. The organization needs to come up with a very methodical, disciplined approach to update and maintain the order sets and retain credibility with the clinicians.
There was a statement recently, by Eric Schmidt of Google, that seemed to imply that in his mind as a technologist, practice of medicine is simple as looking up reference information, correlating it to patient information, and out pops a diagnosis and a treatment plan. How can the art of medicine be reconciled with the support that software can provide to those who actually practice it?
I’m an internist. I’ve taken care of a number of patients in my life. Medical care is complicated. I think that it’s complicated for a number of reasons.
In some cases, there may not be evidence to support a particular treatment decision. In some cases, the evidence might be conflicting. In other cases, the patient may have many co-morbid illnesses.
It’s often not as simple as a patient that has one illness and therefore, this recommendation will always work for this patient. Many patients who are hospitalized have many different co-morbid illnesses which increase the complexity of clinical decision support.
Then finally, patient preferences are very important. I may suggest to a patient that there’s a particular drug I would like the patient to take, but the patient may have had a bad experience with the drug in the past, or may know someone with a very bad experience from that drug in the past. Therefore, for that patient, that drug may not be the most appropriate.
I think medicine is highly complex. Evidence-based information is critically important to informed care; but at the end of the day, what evidence-based medicine does is inform the best possible care. Each doctor and nurse has to understand the preferences and beliefs of his or her patients to make sure that the care is individualized to lead to the best possible care for any individual patient.
Has the industry moved enough toward guiding the caregiver, rather than warning them of conditions? In other words, helping them make a decision, rather than telling that they’ve made the wrong one?
I think so. I think order sets will help guide clinicians to making the right decision. They really do not tell clinicians they’ve made the wrong decision, so I think as an industry we’re heading in the right direction. I think that’s exactly what you want to do. You want to guide them to make the right decisions, rather than you made the wrong decision.
From Farrell: “Re: Microsoft. Substitute Epic for Microsoft in this article and it holds true.” The article, written by a former Microsoft VP, observes that Microsoft is a “clumsy, uncompetitive innovator” whose products are “lampooned” and its marketing “inept” as it loses market share in nearly every important category, milking profits from Office and Windows but falling slowly into irrelevance otherwise. Company bureaucracy and infighting are blamed.
From Nell: “Re: McKesson. W-2 forms have always listed the employer as McKesson Corporation. The ones just sent out say McKesson Information Solutions LLC. I wonder if they are quietly preparing to spin off the HIT division?” I figured it was probably a Delaware corporation, so I check that state’s corporate database. That corporation was formed in 1974, so I don’t know why it’s suddenly showing up on W-2s. Could mean something, could mean nothing.
From Warren: “Re: QuadraMed layoffs. This is absolutely not true. There has been senior leadership change in sales, resulting in some realignment of the sales force, and two sales folks were let go. QuadraMed Sales is now better aligned to serve its clients. QuadraMed is absolutely committed to meeting Meaningful Use requirements for current and future QCPR customers. These types of rumors can be deal killers — please vet sources carefully before printing.” I held the first report I received suggesting layoffs and a change in the QCPR product just in case it was bogus. I then received two more saying the same thing. All three came from non-anonymous sources I’ve known for years who are also pro-QuadraMed. The official company contact told Inga last time we asked that they do not address rumors. We asked about this one anyway, but her e-mail bounced back as undeliverable. It’s tough to confirm when the company won’t talk. Still, I would be happy to hear that layoffs were minimal and that QCPR will live on. If it were me, I’d get an announcement out there.
From Doug Wallace: “Re: Dwight Schrute from The Office on EMRs. ‘I think one of the greatest things about modern America is the computerization of medical records. As a volunteer sheriff, I can look up anyone’s psychiatric records or surgical histories.’”
From FreddieMac: “Re: Cerner. In order to improve cash flow, the company is aggressively pursuing complete IT outsourcing deals (like MU) among its client hospitals through any any back door they can. Of course, they think RHO Millennium translates into knowing how to run all the other aspects of health IT. I believe they got Naples Community and are trying for some other academics. Beats the hell out of trying to compete with Epic for new sales.” It’s a good strategy, I think, and I expect it will open some doors to hospitals who don’t consider data center operations to be core. Not to mention that, as you noted, Epic is taking most of the pie anyway. (I just noticed that I said Cerner, Epic, and pie together … could that be a HISsies Freudian slip?)
From Mark: “Re: Dragon Naturally Speaking. I bought it on your first recommendation and absolutely love it. A product that lives up to its billing, just like HIStalk!" Another reader suggested that I note, probably unnecessarily, that I am using DNS for personal use, which is why it was cheap. For EMRs, you would need Dragon Medical, which comes with integration tools, a medical vocabulary, and a much larger price tag. My point is still valid: speech recognition absolutely works and is not just for geeks any more.
Mcesson announces Practice Partner Connect, an interoperability platform for users of its Practice Partner physician system.
Loma Linda University Medical Center chooses the MDaudit Hospital compliance and revenue risk mitigation system from Hayes Management Consulting.
eMix will launch its vendor-neutral medical imaging information exchange at HIMSS. The company is affiliated with DR Systems.
Janeen Cook says thanks for taking a look at her nursing video. She won the Vanderbilt School of Nursing student video contest with 560 views, saying, “One of my former team members said I was just like Susan Boyle. Wait a minute, I thought — is that a complement being thought of as frumpy and a bit odd? ”
Englewood Hospital and Medical Center (NJ) signs up for McKesson Horizon Clinicals and Horizon Enterprise Revenue Management.
I’m entering my second week or so of being ridiculously behind, so if you are expecting something from me, I’ll try to catch up over the weekend.
Arizona Regional Medical Center (AZ) chooses clinical and financial systems from HMS.
Mayo Clinic takes a minority position in Centerphase, a startup that will mine Mayo’s patient database to find patients who qualify for specific clinical drug trials.
eMids Technologies offers an “AGILE for ARRA” presentation at HIMSS that covers iterative product development. If you are involved in product development and delivery, you can sign up for the Tuesday morning breakfast at the “W” Hotel here.
This week’s e-mail from Kaiser Permanente CEO George Halvorson notes that of 16 organizations winning a Continuous Availability Award for computer uptime, Kaiser was the only healthcare winner. Two of its data centers that host clinical systems had 100% uptime for the full year, with overall availability of HealthConnect at over 99.9%.
Alert, the hospital information system vendor from Portugal that had fanboys swooning at HIMSS a few years ago and then promptly sank without a trace, signs its fourth hospital customer.
Sentara CIO Bert Reese is interviewed on Cox Business TV, talking about EMRs and interoperability.
Please welcome Precyse Solutions, which has joined our merry band as a Platinum Sponsor of HIStalk. The Wayne, PA company offers a variety of HIM-related services: transcription, coding, consulting, outsourcing, oncology data management, audit, clinical documentation improvement, and its PrecyseAssist service to answer difficult coding and claims questions. You can download a variety of Webinars and presentations from their site for more information. Googling just to see what I’d said about them previously, I notice the company made my radar in mid-2008, when I said this: “I’d watch this company: HIM vendor Precyse Solutions puts Pam Arlotto and Carl Witonsky on its advisory board, giving them a lot of strategic horsepower.” Thanks to Precyse Solutions for their gracious support of HIStalk and those who read it.
A non-profit clinic run by an associate of a Louisiana Parish councilman overbilled West Jefferson Medical Center by $150,000 for its treatment of uninsured patients, an audit uncovers. Also discovered: the clinic had $100,000 in missing checks and undocumented purchases, spent $29,000 on parties, and gave $100,000 in interest-free loans to employees. The hospital has paid the clinic $4.2 million to keep patients out of its ED since 2004. The former clinic CEO says missing documentation for certain payments was caused by an accounting software virus.
We’re booming over at HIStalk Mobile, to the point that we could use some help. I’m interested in talking to a physician, resident, or med student who has good understanding of mobile health and would like to share their passion with our readers in some sort of paid arrangement. E-mail me. I also just remembered that I probably didn’t mention our latest HIStalk Mobile Founding Sponsor, Voalté, so thanks very much to the Men (and Women) in Pink for their support.
College Park Family Care Center in Overland Park, KS wins a free radiology information system from Swearingen Software, chosen as the most deserving “hardship” radiology department.
Rich Helppie’s Santa Rosa Consulting announces (warning: PDF) its merger with CSA Consulting. Both companies are in Michigan.
Jobs: Information Services Manager (VA), Information Systems ERP Manager (WA), Clinical/EMR Project Manager (NC).
After-hours medical services come under fire in England after the recent death of a patient under the care of a sleep-deprived doctor brought over from Germany and put immediately to work with no rest. Computer problems are named as an issue since doctors can’t see each other’s records. The newspaper article cites a 2005 case in which a post-surgical patient spoke to six doctors by phone and saw two in person, only to die of undiagnosed septicemia.
The VA will freeze its $3.3 billion IT budget in FY11.
Canada reaches national consensus on using GS1 bar codes for drug products, led by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices and the Canadian Patient Safety Institute. The GS1 bar codes are smaller, hold more information, and can hold product-specific codes such as lot numbers and expiration dates that can be used to track products through the supply chain.
Meditech just released its annual report. Revenue was down 1%, the first drop in the five historical years listed. Product revenue dropped to $176 million from last year’s $186 million. Net income was way up at $81 million compared to a big investment-related drop in 2008, but still lagging compared to the past few years. Neil Pappalardo has 13.8 million shares worth $511 million at the internally set share price. I wouldn’t say the company is struggling, but the long string of growth numbers has clearly ended just as HIT spending increases. It will be interesting to see how well it competes for the small hospital business fueled by HITECH.
EnovateIT kicks off a dramatic expansion of its mobile and wall-mounted clinical workstation manufacturing facility, increasing its current space fivefold. The company also forecasts record 2010 sales and announced plans for further expansion later this year.
NHS Scotland will use TrakCare from InterSystems as its patient management system.
Informatics Corporation of America makes a white paper available called Health Care IT Investment Heightens Need For Effective Implementation.
A bizarre, only-in America lawsuit: Heart Attack Grill, a Arizona restaurant characterized as its attorney as “the originator of the medically-themed hamburger grill and restaurant” whose motto is “Taste Worth Dying For", files suit against Florida-based Heart Stoppers Sports Grill. The former has waitresses dressed as nurses serving Bypass Burgers and Jolt Cola, while the latter does the same for its Chili Chest Pain Fries. Another point requiring intellectual property interpretation: both restaurants offer free food to anybody weighing over 350 pounds.
E-mail me.
HERtalk by Inga
Picis and iSOFT form a strategic alliance that gives iSOFT the right to distribute, implement, and support selected Picis CareSuite solutions. iSOFT’s initial marketing focus will be on ICU and anesthesia in the UK, Ireland, Scandinavia, Australia, and New Zealand.
Design Clinicals’ MedsTracker medication reconciliation application is now fully integrated with Wellsoft’s Medication Verification & Exchange capabilities. CentraState Medical Center (NJ) was the first ED to employ the integrated solution.
Design Clinicals, by the way, gains an exclusive endorsement from the AHA for its MedsTracker program, having proved its ability to help health care organizations achieve organizational excellence.
I love the guys at Vitalize Consulting Solutions. Rather than spending thousands to throw a big party at HIMSS, the company has decided to donate funds to the Atlanta Community Food Bank. Of course I have nothing against big parties, but I like social consciousness as well. So, here is what VCS is doing. For every person who signs up to follow them on Twitter, joins their Facebook group, or leaves a comment on the “Help Us Help Atlanta” blog, they will donate $1 to the food bank. (do it now before you forget!) Or, you can pay them a visit at booth #5203 at HIMSS. Last year VCS had an equally cool program that allowed HIMSS attendees and VCS donate thousands of soup packets and money to the Chicago Food Bank.
Christiana Care Health System (DE) announces its go-live on CPOE at its Wilmington Hospital. The health system will soon launch CPOE at its other facility, Christiana Hospital.
The US Patent and Trademark Office awards Medicity a patent for its agent-grid technology for health information exchange. The technology is the core of Medicity’s Novo Grid, which provides EHR integration and community-wide information exchange. We did a HIStech Report on Novo Innovations a couple of years ago,before it was purchased by Medicity. I remember at the time thinking that if it worked they way Robert Connely said it did, it was some hot technology. Guess the patent guys agreed.
The folks at EHR Scope blog did an awesome job summarizing our recent EHR executives series on the proposed meaningful use criteria. If you missed the series, the EHR Scope article succinctly outlines the bottom line opinion of each executive to each question. It’s interesting to see what vendors share similar philosophies on certain topics and who provided the more unique perspectives.
Edward Hospital in Naperville (IL) formally names Barbara Byrne, MD vice president of HIT. Byrne is former clinical director for CCHIT and was named a CCHIT commissioner just last month.
Would you pay $50 to text one question to one doctor? Truth On Call is hoping patients, or perhaps physicians in developing countries, will take advantage of the service. Patients text their questions on cell phones and the doctor texts back, receiving $10 for each question. The model sounds interesting, especially if you think about physicians in rural India needing a quick opinion from doctors in the US. But $50 per question per doctor? Seriously?
Here’s a more mainstream product that happens to be free. Text4Baby is a mHealth service designed for pregnant women and new moms through the baby’s first year. Expectant mothers can text “baby” to sign up for the service and receive three to four text messages a week that align with their due date. Federal CTO Aneesh Chopra is promoting its use to make sure moms-to-be and babies stay healthy. Voxiva created the system, mentioned by the company’s co-founder, chairman, and president Paul Meyer in our November interview.
I’m kind of glad that most of my plane rides are fairly boring. On the other hand, passengers on this flight had a bit more entertainment, when shortly after take-off, a man starts screaming, drops his pants, and attacks crew members. He later admits he overmedicated himself before take-off, downing a double dose of medical marijuana cookies.
E-mail Inga.
