Home » Time Capsule » Currently Reading:

Time Capsule: Everybody Hates Their IT Department: Where Alignment, Control, and Honesty Collide

December 21, 2012 Time Capsule No Comments

I wrote weekly editorials for a boutique industry newsletter for several years, anxious for both audience and income. I learned a lot about coming up with ideas for the weekly grind, trying to be simultaneously opinionated and entertaining in a few hundred words, and not sleeping much because I was working all the time. They’re fun to read as a look back at what was important then (and often still important now).

I wrote this piece in March 2008.

Everybody Hates Their IT Department: Where Alignment, Control, and Honesty Collide
By Mr. HIStalk


I was talking to a colleague at HIMSS about IT departments. “Our users hate us,” he lamented. “We’re nice people trying to do the right thing, but they hate us. You wouldn’t believe some of the jokes and nasty comments we hear.”

The easy answer is that nobody likes being told they can’t do something. That’s a core competency of many IT departments: telling users they can’t install software on PCs, can’t buy systems without IT approval, and can’t blow the entire organization’s IT budget buying big-screen monitors and stylish laptops. Doing their job as laid out by leadership, in other words, as unpopular as that may be.

Implementation projects, however, probably encourage even more unlikable behavior. The marching orders are to get the system live, on time, and on budget. If that means steamrolling user objections for the good of the order, even valid ones, so be it.

In that respect, the interests of the IT department and its vendor are aligned. So, it’s not surprising that users regard them both with the same distrust and sometimes disgust, writing them off as fast-talking flimflammers trying to put something over on the people who have to live with their systems long after they’ve moved on to the next project.

IT is just another vendor. Vendors are unresponsive, clueless, and untrustworthy, users reason. Ergo, we hate them all. They get no credit for trying to do the right thing in moving the big-picture dial.

IT lives in the world of conference rooms, PowerPoints, and big teams. Clinicians thrive on making quick solo decisions with whatever information is available, changing the plan after seeing the result. It’s an honest world, though, and when IT people try to hard-sell the benefits of going live, changing processes, and accepting software inadequacies, the “us vs. them” atmosphere sets in quickly.

Clinicians are also quick to spot even well-intentioned dishonesty or heavy-handed enlightenment campaigns since they deal with human frailties all day long. When project people conspire offline to minimize or even hide major software problems, enlist secret allies to manipulate group thinking, or strategize with leadership to marginalize whiners, finely-tuned clinician noses immediately catch the unmistakable whiff of manure.

Sometimes those noses pick up the scent of condescension as well. IT folks fancy themselves as process experts and unbiased observer, which they very well may be. Users can’t make decisions, aren’t consistent in processes, and don’t understand the big picture, the logic goes. Using that knowledge to influence behavioral change, however, requires an incredible amount of finesse and ongoing respect. Those qualities don’t always run deep in IT-land.

It’s nearly impossible, in other words, for IT to be the much-loved middleman for policies made at the top but despised at the bottom: technology control, process change, and application imperatives. The IT department is often smack in the middle of clashes between what executive management wants and what the rank-and-file is willing to do with the resources they have.

It may be oversimplification to say that every IT department that’s doing its job will be scorned by users. In hospitals, however, the current state of leadership and IT alignment nearly assures it.

View/Print Text Only View/Print Text Only

HIStalk Featured Sponsors


Subscribe to Updates



Text Ads

Report News and Rumors

No title

Anonymous online form
Rumor line: 801.HIT.NEWS



Founding Sponsors


Platinum Sponsors































































Gold Sponsors















Reader Comments

  • Cindy Gagnon: Excellent article -- I 100% agree. Thank you for consistently articulating the realities of the healthcare informatics ...
  • Randy Bak: Re: Biden's remarks-- I've been letting slide all this talk of patient "data" and access to it, feeling it isn't worth t...
  • Brian Too: It's eerie to hear a healthcare vendor story about Lake Mary, FL. We used to get McKesson support for our Series produc...
  • Janice Willingham: As a recent new reader of this excellent site and former IT worker now on the quasi tech side of the "business side" of ...
  • Another Dave: Orwellian Aeron chair: If sitting is the new smoking, I sure this exercise motivator will have some real health benefit...
  • Art_Vandelay: The instability of the Operating and Capital budgets from year-to-year. Understanding where dollars are sourced, how, fr...
  • SoCal grunt: I for one did select Meditech. The people were welcoming and seemed to be the only ones insterested in having a discussi...
  • Annon: 100% agree, this is vaporware, they are not doing anything remotely close to interoperability. Not the only ones though,...
  • Brian Too: Wait... I thought that any voids in the brain automatically filled up with cerebro-spinal fluid? Wouldn't an air void c...
  • Ophelia: Where are you seeing the 97% MIPS claim? I'm aware of their claimed 97% attestation rate for MU, but I haven't seen anyt...

RSS Industry Events

  • An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.

Sponsor Quick Links