Home » Dr. Jayne » Currently Reading:

Curbside Consult with Dr. Jayne 7/2/12

July 2, 2012 Dr. Jayne 1 Comment


It’s been four days since the Supreme Court issued its decision on the Affordable Care Act. I did get to have a little fun with it on Friday. One of the guys I work with fancies himself a Supreme Court aficionado, so I left a beribboned bunch of broccoli in a decorative vase on his desk. He totally didn’t get it, which made the day of several people.

Watching my physician colleagues react to the decision has been interesting, particularly because some are so detached from really understanding its impact. They’re well-versed, however, in knowing what the various talking heads are saying about it on TV and in other media.

In talking through it with one of my CMIO colleagues, we came up with a theory. Since we spend so much time in hospitals, most of the physicians we’re exposed to on a daily basis are hospital based. These are typically procedural specialists in higher income brackets and they tend to be more self protective and income oriented. Not surprisingly, most of them cited the upholding of the Act as the end of truth, justice, and the American way.

Reaching out to some primary care colleagues, there was a greater proportion of physicians who support the act, but I was surprised by the number of front-line family physicians who reacted with extreme negativity. Several expressed the opinion that this decision is just the beginning of ongoing legal wrangling which will distract from the real work that needs to be done in reworking the American health care system. Although the Act will allow more patients to be covered by private insurance or Medicaid, it doesn’t materially change the availability of care in the short term.

Professional organizations are predicting an increase in patients seeking care in the emergency department rather than in the ambulatory primary care setting. The forecast shortage of physicians needed to care for the influx of patients into the health care system still hovers at 60,000. Interventions such as telemedicine that could allow physicians to better care for patients in continuity (and keep them off of overcrowded office schedules) still aren’t reimbursed by major insurance payers. Subspecialty providers are rewarded for performing procedures and high-tech interventions, while primary care practices are forced to subsidize care management initiatives with the promise of potential future income that may never be realized.

The American Academy of Family Physicians praised (their word, not mine) the decision in an online posting and received numerous negative comments. These reflect the ongoing divisions in the medical community that won’t be resolved until real care transformation takes place.

I’m sure additional legal challenges will follow and states will maneuver as much as they can. Physicians will continue to be in limbo. I don’t foresee a jump in the ranks choosing primary care, nor do I see care actually becoming more affordable.

Are you a front-line physician with an opinion on the decision? E-mail me.


E-mail Dr. Jayne.

View/Print Text Only View/Print Text Only

HIStalk Featured Sponsors


Currently there is "1 comment" on this Article:

  1. >>> Reaching out to some primary care colleagues, there was a greater proportion of physicians who support the act, but I was surprised by the number of front-line family physicians who reacted with extreme negativity.

    Really? This is news to me. Back in 2009 Investors Business Daily asked a bunch of doctors what they thought about the ACA. They came up with these numbers:

    — 65% hate it, 33% support it
    — 45% will plan on retiring

    This pretty much mirrors what you read over at the physician-only site at http://www.sermo.com.

    URL: http://news.investors.com/photopopup.aspx?path=FP0916_3090915.png&docId=506199&xmpSource=&width=602&height=576&caption=

    How about you- what do YOU think about the ACA?

Subscribe to Updates



Text Ads

Report News and Rumors

No title

Anonymous online form
Rumor line: 801.HIT.NEWS



Founding Sponsors


Platinum Sponsors
























































Gold Sponsors

















Reader Comments

  • FRANK POGGIO: Shows to go ya...answering black and white Jeopardy questions is a far cry from the massive grey area of medicine/pharma...
  • Number Cruncher: You are right AC. The cost is seriously underestimated here. Just looking at the numbers - $1 B for 5 years = $200 M ...
  • Abraham Van Helsing: Re Theranos. Will be interesting to follow the saga. As I and others had noted going back 2+ years, something was obvi...
  • Prof. Moriarty: Re: Watson pull out. I've not been directly involved with this product, but from its beginning I have always seen Watso...
  • mih: Of course they can, and for much much cheaper. But why would they do it? Existing arrangement works for everyone in the ...
  • Andrew M. Harrison: Thanks for (actually) reading our paper. I enjoyed the story of your friend, as well as the translation of numbers to em...
  • Mike: I would love to see this type of discussion around Blockchain. It is being hyped heavily currently. Yet, I wonder how we...
  • Brian Too: Just slightly off-topic, but I recently heard an interesting downtime rule-of-thumb: Every hour of downtime requires 2 ...
  • James E Thompson: AI in particular isn't disruptive until it can offer an effective alternative against which a go/no-go decision makes se...
  • Former Newspaper Guy: I applaud your attention to grammar and style. In high school, I worked for the local newspaper in the sports department...

RSS Industry Events

  • An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.

Sponsor Quick Links