Home » News » Currently Reading:

ONC Announces Meaningful Use Stage 2 Proposed Rule Release

February 22, 2012 News 3 Comments

National Coordinator Farzad Mostashari announced Wednesday morning at the HIMSS conference that new proposed Meaningful Use requirements have been sent to the Federal Register, with publication expected Thursday morning.

Mostashari says ONC followed the guidance provided by the Health IT Standards and Policy Committees, as the new proposed regulations “stayed the course” as ONC “listened and we learned.” He said ONC tried to get the new regulations out weeks ago, but could not complete the work in time to avoid release during the HIMSS conference.

2-22-2012 9-29-10 PM

The broad themes to be addressed in the Notice of Proposed Rule Making for Stage 2 are:

  • Increased emphasis on health information exchange.
  • Increased emphasis on patient engagement.
  • New requirements for hospital patient safety, specifically with regard to electronic medication administration records.
  • Requirements involving tying clinical decision support to quality measures.
  • A philosophical goal of flexibility and reducing provider and vendor burdens.

Specific issues are:

  • The Direct protocol will be required.
  • SNOMED will become the standard for encoding problem lists.
  • Infobutton (i.e. the blue button initiative) will e expanded, with requirements that patients be able to view, download, and exchange their own information. The proposed legislation calls for 10% of patients to actually do this.
  • While Stage 1 required theoretical information exchange capability in test mode, Stage 2 will require providers to exchange information “across organizational and vendor boundaries,” which also includes submission to public health agencies.
  • Encryption and usability requirements will increase.
  • Viewing of images will be supported as an optional item.
  • Physicians in group practice will be allowed to submit their quality measures electronically as a group.
  • Stage 1 will be extended for another year, though 2013 for those who first attest in 2011. Providers can then stay on Stage 2 for another two years.
  • The last date to attest without penalties will be October 1, 2014.
  • An increased emphasis will be placed on making referrals electronic.
  • Electronic submission to cancer registries will be added as a menu item.

ONC announced its intentions to create a new certification called Certified EHR Technology that would replace existing forms of certification. This would begin with the 2014 reporting period. If EPs can meet Meaningful Use via exclusion, they will not need a CEHRT product.

2-22-2012 9-30-30 PM

Under CEHRT certification, which ONC prefers to be called 2014 Edition, the baseline requirements would be for a Base EHR that would include:

  • A history and problem list.
  • Clinical decision support capability.
  • Provider order entry.
  • Quality capture and data query.
  • Exchange and integration capability.
  • Privacy and security capabilities.

MU Core and MU Menu will contain additional levels.

Providers can meet the definition of Core EHR in any of three ways:

  • By using a Complete EHR compliant with 2014 criteria.
  • By using a combination of modules.
  • By using a single EHR module.

ONC says it will post the draft document in Word format to its Web site. It will also encourage using electronic submission for the comment process.

View/Print Text Only View/Print Text Only

HIStalk Featured Sponsors


Currently there are "3 comments" on this Article:

  1. Why does the ONC remain so fixated on Direct. While it is technically exchange of patient information, it doesn’t give the provider a full picture of the patient’s record, only what one organization sends. It’s OK to support this as an option, but their requirement to do it before you can implement real HIE capability is hard to understand.

  2. ONC is fixated on Direct because Direct is easy and allows them to declare victory without getting into the nitty gritty of actually achieving widespread interoperability.

  3. I saw the reference above to SNOMED being a requirement, but I can’t find any reference to it in the NPRM. Was this just a verbal comment by Mostashari?

    [From Mr. H] I’ll ask others to back me up on hearing this. It was one of the first things he said when he took the podium and I wrote it down specifically. I would think it would have been mentioned in more detail in some of the other ONC sessions at HIMSS, so if anyone knows more, please chime in.

Subscribe to Updates



Text Ads

Report News and Rumors

No title

Anonymous online form
Rumor line: 801.HIT.NEWS



Founding Sponsors


Platinum Sponsors





























































Gold Sponsors
















Reader Comments

  • David Butler: I absolutely love this article! I'm fairly new to following HIStalk and Dr. Jayne (and the various portions of the site...
  • MiroslavB: Great insights - Thanks Ed !...
  • SteveS: I’d like to hear more from Ed about his perspective on the current state of “Professional Organizations” – in te...
  • Brian Too: Nice to hear from a small hospital for a change. We hear lots from the large players and consolidation has meant that b...
  • Sam Lawrence: Except in this case, coding = medical billing, not development. Though the same warning may be true...
  • BeenThere: Partners will find the savings from their cuts of coders as fools gold. There are a lot of hidden costs running an outs...
  • JC: If there is not there can be. VistA has a reference lab interface that can create the manifests/labeling and such as we...
  • Tom Cornwell: Great stuff from Dr. Jayne as usual. One small typo, last sentence of second-to-last paragraph: should be 'who's' not 'w...
  • HIT Observer: What I find most interesting here, is people defending their common practices rather than truly taking this as invaluabl...
  • Bob: There's no incentive for the provider to spend time doing a price comparison for the patient. Nor is it a good use of th...

Sponsor Quick Links