Home » News » Currently Reading:

CIO Unplugged – 10/1/08

October 1, 2008 News No Comments

The views and opinions expressed in this blog are mine personally, and are not necessarily representative of Texas Health Resources or its subsidiaries.

Brigades, Battalions, and Budgets
By Ed Marx

Ah Fall. The crisp air. A scenic array of dancing leaves. Squirrels foraging for groceries. And of course, football.

Oh yes, and budgets!

Each year at this time, corporate America undergoes a fandango abounding in ritual. We perform the dance of sworn improvements, promising to enhance processes and reduce pain. But at the end of the day, or should I say months, little has changed. The mist of illusion dissipates, and we find ourselves reinstating the customs of familiarity and comfort. Insanity, as some describe it—expecting change while doing things the same way.

Part of the corporate America ritual goes something like this. Create and submit a pork-filled budget. Mandates go out to make across-the-board cuts. We make the cuts, and inflated budgets become more realistic. Additional mandates call for further reductions and managers dutifully wince and deal. Dependent upon the financial outlook, the budgets find acceptance; nevertheless, the call goes out for another round of cuts. This forces managers to sub-optimize valuable programs and services, targeting areas that, as a rule, should remain untouched. Without counting the cost, they sacrifice so-called discretionary spending: travel, training, education, and entertainment.

Here’s my take on the ultimate solution. Avoid across-the-board budget reduction mandates altogether. Instead, target programs and services that have a wide swath across the organization’s traditional budget silos. Eliminate or delay a planned integrated initiative before you reduce associated expenses and end up with a sub-optimal outcome. “You can’t cut your way to prosperity,” as I learned from a former mentor, Tom Zenty (CEO, University Hospitals, Cleveland). Choose to heavily invest dollars in areas that will push top line revenue growth so as to create more opportunity for clinical advancement.

The unfortunate reality? This rarely happens in corporate America.

As an Army Combat Engineer Officer (Reserves), I lived out a similar budget cycle. We platoon leaders had to decide what to cut and how to avoid sub-optimizing services and product. While in this environment, I adopted an approach that I use today when confronting across-the-board-mandates. I’ll sum it up with a question: Would you rather carry 40 average soldiers into battle or lead 35 of the best trained, equipped, skilled, and talented?

As a junior officer preparing for a major military exercise, I tackled the following dilemma. Assessing my platoon of forty untrained soldiers, I looked for the champions: those with the solid attitude of a soldier; any man or woman who displayed leadership talent; and the ones eager to learn and improve. After sifting the wheat from the chaff, I invested in the promising soldiers, training and equipping each one. Judgment day arrived. During the exercise, we surpassed all production expectations. My 35 soldiers outperformed peer platoons that operated with full numbers but lacked the advantage of an empowering investment.

Although it may appear counterintuitive to some, I have since applied this principle throughout my healthcare career. The effort is worth it, and the end product speaks for itself. Leaders reap what they sow, as do corporations. When the budget reduction mandates come, and they invariably will, I’ll pursue the 35 trained, equipped, skilled, and talented.

Ed Marx is senior vice president and CIO at Texas Health Resources in Dallas-Fort Worth, TX. Ed encourages your interaction through this blog. (Use the “add a comment” function at the bottom of each post.) You can also connect with him directly through his profile pages on social networking sites LinkedIn and Facebook, and you can follow him via Twitter – User Name “marxists.”

View/Print Text Only View/Print Text Only


HIStalk Featured Sponsors

     







Subscribe to Updates

Search


Loading

Text Ads


Report News and Rumors

No title

Anonymous online form
E-mail
Rumor line: 801.HIT.NEWS

Tweets

Archives

Founding Sponsors


 

Platinum Sponsors


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold Sponsors


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reader Comments

  • HIT Observer: What I find most interesting here, is people defending their common practices rather than truly taking this as invaluabl...
  • Bob: There's no incentive for the provider to spend time doing a price comparison for the patient. Nor is it a good use of th...
  • Peppermint Patty: Veteran - can you clarify what was "fake "? Was something made up (definition of fake) or did you disagree with Vapo...
  • Pat Wolfram: Such a refreshing article. Thanks -- there really can be a simpler version of an acute HIT implementation. But I do ...
  • Woodstock Generation: Bravo to HIStalk's Weekender recaps and other news/opinions. I read it first thing on Monday mornings..................
  • Veteran: #fakenews...
  • Vaporware?: Secretary Shulkin: "the American healthcare system hasn’t yet figured out interoperability, but the VA can lead the wa...
  • Justa CIO: The reported go live date for McLaren Oakland is wrong. There are no dates set for activations for any locations. Post...
  • Brian Too: I admit I am partial to the quoted ICD-10-CM of "S07.9XXA Crushing injury of head, part unspecified, initial encounter....
  • Cosmos: As others in the comments section have pointed out before, GE's EMR for athletes is ironically a health record for the h...

Sponsor Quick Links