Home » Time Capsule » Currently Reading:

Time Capsule: Buying Doctors Systems They Don’t Want: Why Even Detroit’s Bailout is More Progressive than the HIMSS EMR Welfare Program

June 7, 2013 Time Capsule 2 Comments

I wrote weekly editorials for a boutique industry newsletter for several years, anxious for both audience and income. I learned a lot about coming up with ideas for the weekly grind, trying to be simultaneously opinionated and entertaining in a few hundred words, and not sleeping much because I was working all the time. They’re fun to read as a look back at what was important then (and often still important now).

I wrote this piece in January 2009.

Buying Doctors Systems They Don’t Want: Why Even Detroit’s Bailout is More Progressive than the HIMSS EMR Welfare Program
By Mr. HIStalk 


I must be getting old. I can actually remember when the most-feared words you could hear were, "I’m from the federal government and I’m here to help."

That has recently changed to, "We’re such terrible businesspeople that we desperately need Uncle Sam as a business partner to survive."

HIMSS is right there in the bread line, begging for $25 billion of taxpayer dollars to help loosen up prospects that haven’t shown much interest in buying the EMRs that its vendor members sell. That’s not too surprising; as a trade association (its words), the #1 job of HIMSS is to help its big-paying vendor members make money, of which Uncle Sam’s is as good as anyone else’s (which isn’t saying much these days since the overheated currency printing presses will probably deflate the dollar’s value as quickly as they’re printed.)

That’s what "advocacy" is all about (don’t you DARE call it "special interest lobbying" because that doesn’t sound as noble, just like the annual conference is an "educational event" rather than drawing in captive provider prospects for the vendor members to woo.) Obama’s got lollipops for everybody, even justifiably failed dinosaurs like venture capital owned Chrysler, proud purveyor of bad cars that even rental car companies avoid. So, why not a nice, round $25 billion to move a few EMRs?

(Prospects don’t have the money for these desperately needed systems, HIMSS intones, yet it rails against free EMRs, whether open source or government created. So, HIMSS is apparently pro- EMR only when its vendor members profit.)

At least Detroit is keeping a straight face when it says it will make much-needed product and efficiency changes with our money. The HIMSS program doesn’t say that the EMR vendors who get the money will change anything at all. To them, the dust-gathering EMR products aren’t the problem, it’s those darned chintzy doctors who won’t buy them. And unlike Detroit, nobody’s offering taxpayers any equity or oversight in the companies that will rake in all the freshly printed money. It’s the EMR version of George Bush’s "everybody go shopping" stimulus package all over again, which did — well, nothing at all except run up the federal debt.

What’s also lacking is any kind of context in the recommendation. With all of healthcare’s problems, is $25 billion for the same old systems really the best investment? If healthcare needs dramatic reform (of which there are few doubters except those who profit from it today), then is this the right time to automate? Are EMR trailblazers having such great success and positive ROI that massive rollout is sure to be worth it?

That last item is the biggest bugaboo in the HIMSS EMR welfare program. Without provider skin in the game, there’s no assurance that we’ll see anywhere near $25 billion worth of patient benefit. "Having" is a long way from "using optimally," especially when one vital fact is brought back by cynics like me: these are systems that most doctors have already assessed as not being worth it. And, in Cynicism Round II: free isn’t cheap enough for systems that take more doctor time to use without giving them any benefit. How about a show of hands of all of you willing to stick around at work for a couple of extra hours each day to use a new computer system that doesn’t benefit you or your employer?

HIMSS has got politicians moistened up at the concept of interoperability as the big payoff for all of this acquisitive action. Sounds great, right? That’s what all those failing RHIOs said, too. "Interoperable" is a theoretical systems capability, quite a long way from overcoming the governance, privacy, and cost problems that stand in the way of actually interoperating. Instead of pushing "interoperable" systems, why not use the $25 billion jackpot to reward providers who actually exchange predefined data instead of just funding their technical capabilities and hoping it will somehow just happen?

That’s my pitch for Uncle Sam. Don’t use my money to fund stale tactics and failed market participants. Use it (if you must) to set the goals of what we really need (improved quality, outcomes, and efficiency), create rewards for meeting them, and let the market decide which tools are best suited for getting the job done. If your EMR can do that, it will fly off the shelf under its own power without requiring HIMSS to fling it at doctors like Cupid’s arrows.

Let’s hope the Detroit equivalent of HIMSS has less self-serving ideas than to simply hand out taxpayer dollars so people can buy Chrysler Sebrings.

View/Print Text Only View/Print Text Only

HIStalk Featured Sponsors


Currently there are "2 comments" on this Article:

  1. Articles like this one brings me back again and again to this blog
    Looking reality in the eye and saying what we all know for a long time but never dared to verbalize
    Exposing all the politrucks, apartchniks, small minded and incompetent dumb asses that make and market all those “great EHRs” the doctors hate so much while the hospitals administrators love to spend others’ big dollars on
    And HIMSS…. the overlord presiding over this insane cacophony
    Keep telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the ugly truth about all these dinosaurs called “vendors” that infest the HIT industry in the USA.
    We all know what will be their fate once the comet named reality will hit their lalaland
    Have a great weekend
    Your long time fan
    Reality Mom

  2. The only disagreement I have with your otherwise excellent view is this is not a ‘welfare program’. If providers think this is free money, manna from Obama heaven, they will wail when the bill comes due next year. Remember, Congress was sold this program by the vendors/HIMSS who paid for the infamous RAND study that said EHRs could save $800bill. That’s a 25 to 1 ROI !.

    Oh, I forgot just recently the Rand folks said they took another look at that study and it was in error. I guess that’ll get everybody off the hook. …and I have a bridge to sell them in Brooklyn…

Subscribe to Updates



Text Ads

Report News and Rumors

No title

Anonymous online form
Rumor line: 801.HIT.NEWS



Founding Sponsors


Platinum Sponsors




































































Gold Sponsors





















Reader Comments

  • Mr. HIStalk: Probably about the same. Amazon didn't offer to let me try the Moto G for one visit and then change if I didn't like it ...
  • ex-HHC: re: Moto G plus. How does the amount of time you spent researching your new phone compare to the amount you put into cho...
  • P. RN: Re: Expired Mallow Cup's post - I couldn't agree more. Building/entering order-sets requires critical thinking. There m...
  • Mobile Man: The "problem" is the "business"... It's the way we pay for healthcare. Everything evolves around that in the "commerci...
  • Income Needer: @ Silence Dogwood: Are you saying that Population Health is not selling? Overall and not limited to Cardigm, I thoug...

Sponsor Quick Links