Monday Morning Update 2/16/26

5 responses

  1. Skeptical
    February 16, 2026

    Re: DODGE releasing Medicaid information. Going to be a lot of amateur sleuths and people wanting social media notoriety digging over data they have no context for being able to understand. I give it one week before we see reports of providers and clinics getting ‘caught’ and attacked over this in another attempt to identify and vilify the ‘other’. Given the types of populations these providers see, it’s hard to imagine this is in good faith.

    • Recovering CIO
      February 16, 2026

      I know I’m a jaded, cynical ex-CIO, but to me the whole point of the DOGE exercise was to let Musk and other cronies get access to federal data, across the spectrum. And they accomplished that. I expect that every bit of federal data they could get their hands on ended up in Grok.

    • Nothing to Fear
      February 17, 2026

      So, your contention is that no Medicaid fraud is occurring and nothing should be looked into in that regard? Is that a reasonable assumption? “Amateur sleuths” have done a pretty good job of uncovering billions in fraud these past few months. If someone is overzealous or uninformed about someone who is not doing anything untoward, then it should not be an issue in correcting the record. You seem to be approaching under the assumption that, 1.) Crowdsourcing analysis should not be done, and 2.) They are not going to find anything, so should not be looking? The chances that this approach will uncover fraud is substantially greater than zero, and anyone who is even aware of the medical system in the US knows this to be true. These are my/your tax dollars. Why do you not want an accounting for where they go, and that it is done in the most efficient way possible. Seems you might just not like what this would reveal from a political standpoint. How is not knowing where money goes and how/if it is being abused helping anyone…..other than those who are doing the defrauding?

      • Brian Too
        February 18, 2026

        So your contention is that DOGE was a good-faith administrative effort? LOL!

        Parachuting in unqualified outsiders ought to be a red flag. Somehow it isn’t. Laying off large numbers of IGs ought to be a red flag. Somehow it isn’t. Contempt for Protected Health Information and the handling thereof ought to be a red flag. Somehow it isn’t.

        Of course there is some criminal Medicaid activity. It’s a massive program and involves millions of people and billions of dollars. Yet getting the police and forensic accountants involved was mysteriously… never done. You know, actual professionals, with codes of ethics and oversight?

        And the apologists for this suggest that “politics” is the motivation for anyone who calls B.S. on DOGE’s activities. DOGE’s stated reason to exist is a fraud. There you sit, defending amateurs, vigilantism, and people who are on the record as partisan citizens with an axe to grind.

        This latest move by DOGE is just another in their ongoing cover story to conceal their true intent. What could that intent be?

        The harvesting of vast amounts of data for fun & profit.

      • Nothing to Fear
        February 19, 2026

        I think you meant to type this on the Reddit boards?

mobile desktop