EPtalk by Dr. Jayne 2/12/26

JAMA Network Open published an interesting Original Investigation last month that set out to answer the question: “Are greater levels of generative artificial intelligence (AI) use by US adults associated with greater levels of depressive symptoms?”

The authors surveyed 20,000 adults. Of those, 10% reported daily use of generative AI tools and 5% said they use it multiple times per day. Higher levels of AI use were linked to increased depressive symptoms, especially in certain age brackets. The authors note that additional research is needed to understand the nature of the association and differences in impact.

AI truly is everywhere, but I was surprised to see it on the new RealFood.gov website that replaced MyPlate.gov. Users who post a question are redirected to the Grok AI tool.

I took advantage of a preloaded sample question that addresses the challenges of eating non-processed foods when the closest food source is a gas station and an individual is on a fixed income. The answer also recommends that users consider food stamps, food pantries, and other community-based options.

Some of our government health leaders are promoting animal fats as healthier options so I decided to poke the AI bear and asked whether animal fats cause heart disease. Grok sided with existing data that suggests that higher consumption of meat, dairy, and eggs is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Score one for Grok in keeping with established mainstream science.

I asked Grok what happened to MyPlate. I was impressed that it clearly identified those who are responsible for the new approach, none of whom are physicians, nutritionists, or dietitians. Grok noted criticisms of the “return to a pyramid format that was abandoned partly because it was harder for people to interpret compared to the simple plate model.”

It also offered a follow-up question that compared the old guidelines to the new. It also identified critics, including Harvard Nutrition Source, Stanford, and public health groups, and their concerns, such as the scientific process that was employed.

As a family physician with a keen interest in the literature, I’m concerned at how this paradigm minimizes fiber. If flipping the guidelines were a scientific study, I’m not sure it would make it past Institutional Review Board approval. So many of us feel like we’re living in an unregulated science experiment.

I asked Grok its thoughts on the links between red meat, fiber, and colon cancer. It gave me a deep dive into exactly how red meat contributes to colorectal cancer risk and the protective nature of fiber. At least I have some facts in my head for the next patient who comes in asking about their diet, because I won’t be recommending the new guidelines without extensive discussion of context and validation.

Amazon One Medical has introduced a new beta feature to help patients navigate their lab results. The Health Insights functionality, which is included in the One Medical membership, provides commentary on 50 standard blood work results while grouping tests together by health domains such as cardiovascular and immune function. Users complete a questionnaire, then the tool generates a wellness score and offers evidence-based lifestyle recommendations with scientific references. I’m not a subscriber, but I would be interested in hearing from anyone who has had a chance to check it out.

Given the number of health systems and care delivery organizations in the US, it seems like someone is always merging, acquiring, or separating. The M Health Fairview brand will be retired from a subset of hospitals in 2027 as part of a new agreement between the University of Minnesota and Fairview Health Services. The deal, which was approved by the university’ board of regents on January 30, shifts the partnership from a joint clinical enterprise to an academic affiliation.

Healthcare administrative types may be familiar with the nuances of those structures, but I doubt that the majority of patients who live in the communities that the organizations serve will understand what the shift means.

The groups will still work together with regard to the University of Minnesota Medical Center. However, details of the agreements that impact the respective physician groups are not yet public. In short, the university will maintain control of academic and research functions, while Fairview will be responsible for hospital operations.

Relations between the two organizations have been strained for a number of years. The university opposed a merger between Fairview and Sanford Health, after which Fairview opposed the university’s push to merge with Essentia Health. The Minnesota Attorney General became involved, triggering facilitation and mediation efforts. The new agreement will be in force for 10 years compared previous partnership’s 30 years.

Speaking of branding, Texas Health Resources has inked a deal to buy naming rights to Texas Health Mansfield Stadium. It includes “prominent branding throughout the stadium, a refreshed logo and a new digital presence… while also laying the foundation for a wide-ranging collaboration focused on community health initiatives.”

The hospital president and CEO indicated that the facility “will serve as the central wellness hub for the entire Mansfield community.” Given the fact that stadiums are typically closed and locked when teams are not in play, it will be interesting to see how it becomes a wellness hub. 

The article mentioned that Texas Health will be the facility’s “Official Health Partner” and “will collaborate on initiatives designed to promote healthier lifestyles, including community programming and enhanced food and beverage offerings that emphasize more nutritious options.” Hide the jumbo nachos and the foot-long corn dog, y’all.

The ASTP meeting kicked off earlier this week, with a focus on the intersection of health IT and the priorities of the US Department of Health and Human Services. Main stage sessions include titles such as “Health Technology for Transparency and Affordability” and “Making America Healthy Again through Technology + Care.” Breakouts covered standards, data exchange, and of course information blocking.

I’m interested to hear from anyone who attended, and in particular, from people who attended previous meetings. How was the attendee mix compared to the past? Were topics handled similarly? What was the overall mood? Leave a comment or email me.

Email Dr. Jayne.