Monday Morning Update 6/27/11

13 responses

  1. GreyingCIO
    June 25, 2011

    Wow – I really appreciated your take on Google health and about the technology industry’s approach to healthcare in general. You could not have been more spot-on – especially the fact that physicians have no regard (nor time) for PHRs whatsoever and that people get no intrinsic reward for maintaining one. Another fallacy of applications pushers even within our industry is that physicians will take time during an encounter to toggle to another application to get additional insight or data. So many new “applications” really need to be built as modules within the EMRs and other tools we already heave so that their value is delivered as part of an integrated tool. Great as always.

  2. JHarper
    June 26, 2011

    The comment about “EPIC” experts reminded me of something.

    After judy’s talk to her company to refer to it as “Epic” for branding purposes. I believe the logic was that no major brand is two words (Epic Systems) using apple, google, microsoft as examples I purposely try to remember and refer to it as Epic Systems whenever possible.

  3. Pete
    June 26, 2011

    I wonder if GT.M will make more inroads if that FIS MISYS deal goes through. Does anyone know if the old Allscripts and Sunquest systems are “married” to Cache yet? FIS would do well to revert back to the MUMPS standard and move everything in-house by porting it to GT.M.

  4. inotroped
    June 26, 2011

    I found your statement revealing of your incredible insight: “Convincing patients to take the time and effort to maintain PHRs is as tough a sell as convincing doctors to voluntarily use CPOE, and for the same reasons: those doing the work don’t get much benefit. ”

    I would like to take this opportunity to tweak the concept. There is not much interest for PHRs, but, with CPOE, it is that there are signs of harm, requiring 24/7 vigilance to protect. CPOE is also an impediment to safe and efficetive communication. You know all about the usability issues, or lack thereof.

    Sincerely,

    Ino

  5. Eddie T. Head
    June 26, 2011

    What a coincidence – the comments to the news about Google Health’s demise carries Microsoft as the “HIStalk Featured Sponsor” 🙂

    What surprised me about the development of Google Health was the Microsoft-like disdain towards existing standards. Given the necessity to automate the input and output of healthcare data in a PHR, Google did not make any effort to participate in HL7 or IHE activities, or to support any of these standards and specifications. Actually, Microsoft have shown more support (at least until recently) for standards than Google in the healthcare area, which is usually reversed.

  6. Frank Poggio
    June 26, 2011

    Don’t celebrate too long about Google giving up on Google Health.

    It was also announced that one of the ONCHIT tiger groups has accepted the PCAST recommendation that the one of the solutions to health care costs and care continuiity is ‘tagged documents’, the higly touted recommendation in the report to the President a few months ago.
    See:http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/12/08/pcast-releases-health-it-report

    And in the HITPC Stage 2 recs their is a requirement that at least 25 patients download their helath info for a provider to meet MU.
    “EPs: patients are offered secure messaging online and at least 25 patients have sent secure messages online…Stage 3: Provide mechanism for patient-entered data (supply list);

    Google may still get what they want…only thru the back door

  7. JHarper
    June 27, 2011

    GT.M will probably make more inroads when it supports windows until then you can host the front end on a local instance of windows but you have to have a server attached. Plus it would be nice for when I’m implementing WorldVista.

  8. John_chilmark
    June 27, 2011

    You’re dead wrong!
    Consumers are no different than docs, they will use software that helps them get the job done. Docs don’t like EHRs because they claim it does not contribute to their business, but in fact takes business away via the productivity hit in this fee for service payment world. Consumers don’t use PHRs for they do not want a digitial filing cabinet for their records and frankly, the majority of the healthcare industry has been VERY RELUCTANT to let consumers have their records in a fully portable format.

    One need only look to KP, the VA or Group Health Collaborative to see that consumers will happily, willingly and delight in the use of a PHR if it is something that is easy to use, provides value. But it also points to what is critical to the success of such, a direct connection to the physician, to the practice and likewise, the physician’s promotion of it’s use.

    So maybe we need to tear down the artificial walls that exist and are promoted by comments such as yours ala “EHRs are good, PHRs are bad” and begin talking about one record, the Collaborative Health Record (CHR) wherein all stakeholders are participants and contributors. This is where we need to focus, this is where this industry needs to move towards if indeed we wish to begin to move to truly patient-centric care.

  9. Cassie
    June 27, 2011

    Regarding the Las Vegas conference schedule – HiMSS is not to blame for this one. It’s the tourist industry and hotel schedulers in Las Vegas. Hotels and convention centers do not want business shows over the weekends since Las Vegas is booked with party-goers and impromptu wedding seekers. Any conference in Las Vegas is week-day based due to the hotel schedule. This one is not the fault of HiMSS.

  10. Peter
    June 27, 2011

    HIMSS staff will be staying over the weekend, as has always happened for every conference, including New Orleans.

    Who do you think the biggest Party-Goers are?

    DUH!

  11. Cassie
    June 27, 2011

    Peter,

    Yes, you are certainly correct that HiMSS staff likes to party. However, one still must examine the numbers between HiMSS staff preparing for the show and conference attendees. This isn’t just a HiMSS issue; it’s a Vegas capacity and hotel revenue stream issue. And yes, it’s an inconvenience to not have the weekend days, but this is one where the blame cannot be laid solely on HiMSS.

  12. Al Finito
    June 29, 2011

    I like John’s comments about a CHR. I believe this is the direction that should have been encouraged by all stakeholders right from the beginning.

    The beginning, I mean as, that part of history when EHRS made the quantum leap from being just xerox copies and fax machines talking to one another and actually evolved to “Form Filler” technology. Which is basically where we are now, except its loaded up with vendor security features like digital watermarks, encrypted or vaulted user interfaces. We all know where this is leading. The big payoff by the king of bailouts… The Taxpayer is going to have to buy a universal user interface.

  13. Spellcheck
    June 30, 2011

    Re:”OptumInsight (formerly Ingenix) is awarded a patient for its LifeCode natural language processing technology”

    Hopefully they get more than a “patient”

    [From Mr. HIStalk] Your spell check is snarky, but slow. I fixed that typo Monday morning.

mobile desktop