Home » Headlines » Currently Reading:

Morning Headlines 7/9/18

July 8, 2018 Headlines 5 Comments

UW Medicine Clinical Transformation: Approve Project, Budget, and Internal Lending Program (ILP) Funding

University of Washington Medicine prepares to move to a single EHR in a 30-month, $180 million project.

The one big winner of the Obamacare wars

Politico surmises that never-ending government healthcare changes and resulting uncertainty, especially those driven by the Affordable Care Act, have been a boon for consultants.

Health Insurers Warn of Market Turmoil as Trump Suspends Billions in Payments

The White House suspends the Affordable Care Act’s risk adjustment payments, which without further action will drive more insurers from the market and increase premiums.

View/Print Text Only View/Print Text Only


HIStalk Featured Sponsors

     

Currently there are "5 comments" on this Article:

  1. I thought UW Medicine was already basically a full Epic shop? This seems like non-news, although $180 million to fill in some gaps seems exorbitant.

  2. $190M in benefits on a $180M project seems pretty convenient. How much staff are they cutting? Are these numbers real?

    • A big chunk of cost savings comes from eliminating several systems and interfaces. Don’t forget that it costs us a lot to maintain separate systems communicating with each other across their independent upgrades. Also, saving maintenance fees.

      • Don’t forget one independent assessment that was done showed no benefits after 10 years. If you don’t think part of new savings comes from staff you haven’t read the notes. We lost millions of dollars last year and staff reduction is the plan to fix the problem.

  3. As a former CFO at a university medical center a ROI of $190m that requires a $180m investment is a ‘no-brainer’ …that is the people moving ahead with it have no brains!
    Any project as large and complex as this has at least a 90% probability of being 20% (or more) over budget. Nor did I see a ‘contingency allowance’ in the budget which would allow for any mistakes.
    Given that, I would need to see at least a 50% ROI before moving ahead. Good luck UW, you’ll need it.







Subscribe to Updates

Search


Loading

Text Ads


Report News and Rumors

No title

Anonymous online form
E-mail
Rumor line: 801.HIT.NEWS

Tweets

Archives

Founding Sponsors


 

Platinum Sponsors


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold Sponsors


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reader Comments

  • Frustrated Patient: " suggesting that my providers don’t really want to open up a can of medical worms by asking how I’m doing overall e...
  • AC: That's good to hear. So the major vendors have worked on this and provided tools. The question now becomes are organizat...
  • Associate CIO: Re: EHR internal timers and event log monitoring Cerner has this as well, it is called the Lights On Network. A curr...
  • Bob: Liked - "The jammed interoperability floodgates would magically open by Labor Day if their payments depended on it."...
  • Bob Smith: Great comment on the interoperability incentives. My experience having been a patient across at least 5 health systems t...
  • richie: Yes Anon, I believe it's in the referenced in supporting documents. Initial: Patients want to know who is grabbing thei...
  • Anonymous: Richie, as someone who hasn't read the proposed rule, do you mind elaborating? Does it really deny patients access to t...
  • InfoDoc: Your pain scale image reminded me of this: http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2010/02/boyfriend-doesnt-have-ebola-...
  • Mr. HIStalk: The actual operating entity, according to the lawsuit, is Jack Hughston Memorial Hospital in Phenix City, which is physi...
  • Gitfishin: Re: AL hospitals paying sales tax on software purchases. Why would a not-for-profit pay taxes? Or does this only apply t...

Sponsor Quick Links