Home » Time Capsule » Currently Reading:

Time Capsule: RHIOs Are Taking Away Resources From Better Projects

April 15, 2011 Time Capsule 1 Comment

I wrote weekly editorials for a boutique industry newsletter for several years, anxious for both audience and income. I learned a lot about coming up with ideas for the weekly grind, trying to be simultaneously opinionated and entertaining in a few hundred words, and not sleeping much because I was working all the time. They’re fun to read as a look back at what was important then (and often still important now).

I wrote this piece in February 2006.

RHIOs Are Taking Away Resources From Better Projects
By Mr. HIStalk

I’ll confess that I’m paying minimal attention to the RHIO craze. Everybody’s starting one, conferences are showcasing speakers who’ve done nothing more than announce theirs, and tiny grants are getting the whole industry atwitter. It’s like living the dot-com frenzy all over again, irrational exuberance and all.

I’m not against RHIOs, but they’re as annoying as CPOE was awhile back, taking resources away from projects that could provide more benefits to patients without the minefields.

I recently interviewed Denni McColm, an award-winning CIO of a 74-bed rural hospital no different than 80 percent of those out there. Oh, except that they’re 100 percent paperless and 100 percent CPOE, something virtually none of the celebrity CIOs and Taj Mahospitals have been able to accomplish. I’ll listen to her, thanks.

First, Denni believes that organizations should be banned from using the word “interoperability” until they can bring their own electronic information to the table. If your IT house isn’t in order, RHIOs don’t need you. Anything short of everyone contributing information equally will cause the whole concept to collapse like an imploded 1960s Las Vegas hotel, so paper jockeys need not apply.

Work instead on projects that will help your patients more than the begrudging swapping of routine lab reports with your cross-town competitor. Or, integrate all those systems you already have. Your admission ticket should be a checklist of what data elements you can supply electronically right now.

Second, Denni advocates a patient-centric RHIO model instead of the common payor-centric one. Do you like insurance companies enough to let them control patient information?

By patient-centered, I don’t mean personal health records. People are too irresponsible to reliably collect and store data with life and death importance. On the other hand, they could be given control over the trusted information generated by hospitals, physician practices, and other providers.

Suppose information resided in an Al Gore-type lockbox that contains everything from discrete electronic data to scanned documents fed over the Internet. Either the patient controls the key (similar to a password) or only they can initiate data delivery to a provider. If they don’t want you to see it, you won’t.

This model makes most privacy concerns go away. It avoids the largely unsolved problem of how you assign some sort of universally mandated patient identifier (aka “political suicide”) to sort out the throngs of people sharing the same name. The patient simply says, “send my data to Dr. Jones” and it’s done. They keep control and there’s no arbitrary “regional” service area beyond which lies a medical no-man’s land.

Maybe some RHIOs work this way. Like I said, I don’t follow them. And, if I can’t see a quick and obvious patient payoff, I probably won’t start following them any time soon. I’ve got plenty of challenges working on clinical system projects that will hopefully save lives right now.

View/Print Text Only View/Print Text Only

HIStalk Featured Sponsors


Currently there is "1 comment" on this Article:

  1. Curious where Mr HISTalk view HIE’s fall in this regard? Are the just another name for RHIO’s or are the more consistent with the lockbox concept except the key is kept by a common healthcare advocacy who understands privacy law much like a bank maintains securely a vault full of lockboxes?

    My thinking is that asking patients to hold the key SOLELY would be like asking a student (or parent) to keep copies of their own high school transcripts to then provide university admission departments. Would they share all their grades (I.e the C’s & D’s) if they did have that sole access?

    Similarly, patients might withhold their excessive use of Vicadin to their specialist or perhaps exclude the diagnosis of a STD for reason of embarrassment that may significantly impact a proper diagnosis or treatment. For these reasons, privacy law doesn’t protect JUST the patient, it protects the caregiver as well.

Subscribe to Updates



Text Ads

Report News and Rumors

No title

Anonymous online form
Rumor line: 801.HIT.NEWS



Founding Sponsors


Platinum Sponsors



























































Gold Sponsors
















Reader Comments

  • Vaporware?: Secretary Shulkin: "the American healthcare system hasn’t yet figured out interoperability, but the VA can lead the wa...
  • Justa CIO: The reported go live date for McLaren Oakland is wrong. There are no dates set for activations for any locations. Post...
  • Brian Too: I admit I am partial to the quoted ICD-10-CM of "S07.9XXA Crushing injury of head, part unspecified, initial encounter....
  • Cosmos: As others in the comments section have pointed out before, GE's EMR for athletes is ironically a health record for the h...
  • HIT MD: I appreciate the thoughtful postings on this topic, particularly those by Ross Martin and LMNOP. I've never participate...
  • My Two Cents: Re: I wish we could all just get along and put the patient at the center of what we do. Yep, I get more and more disc...
  • bbc: Did you take the Hippocratic Oath in Med school? does the slightest thought of helping your patients concern you at all...
  • My Two Cents: I have a few concerns about the article Mr. Crane wrote on Drug Pricing Transparency and respectfully disagree and quest...
  • Brian Too: Aha! That makes more sense now. Thank you for clarifying....
  • So.....: Why not embed this functionality in to the patient portal and let the patient take on the leg work and the extra clicks?...

Sponsor Quick Links