Home » News » Currently Reading:

HIMSS Issues Healthcare IT Recommendations for the Obama Administration

December 17, 2008 News 4 Comments

HIMSS issued its healthcare IT recommendations for the Obama Administration and Congress this morning, stating that "2009 is the year for healthcare reform in the United States." The recommendations were assembled by a 100-volunteer work group that convened from September through December, led by the chairs of the HIMSS Advocacy & Public Policy Steering Committee and Government Relations Roundtable.

The themes of the recommendations are:

  • Using at least $25 billion of federal money to get providers to a mid-level stage of EMR adoption
  • Elevating the ONCHIT office with more authority and visibility
  • Pushing CCHIT and HITSP standards as a condition of government assistance
  • Expanding telehealth
  • Reviewing privacy policies

HIMSS recommends:

  • Spending at least $25 billion of federal money ($5 billion per year for the next five years) to help hospitals and practices adopt EMRs, not including additional money for federal and state providers.
  • Paying providers to achieve Stage 4 of the HIMSS Analytics EMR adoption model by the end of 2014 in the form of grants, loan, and tax benefits.
  • Making funding available only for purchase or upgrade of CCHIT-certified products that meet HITSP interoperability specifications, claiming that "CCHIT has help streamline the EHR market by serving as a trusted source to guide providers when adopting health IT product."
  • Expanding Stark exemptions to cover "additional healthcare software and related devices" that are CCHIT certified and that meet HITSP interoperability specifications.
  • Codifying and funding HITSP as the National Standards Harmonization Body for five years.
  • Codifying a "Senior Level Health IT Leader" in the administration to oversee a national healthcare IT strategy, saying that "ONC has not been codified into law and does not have adequate authority to coordinate health IT activities through all federal departments and the US."
  • Authorizing a coordinating body to advise the administration on healthcare IT and coordinate the standards work of HITSP and CCHIT.
  • Conducting a White House summit specifically on reforming healthcare with IT to generate consensus and solutions within 90 days of the inauguration.
  • Urging Congress and the Secretary of HHS to establish a "patient identify solution."
  • Supporting "the routine updating of codes and coding systems for effective healthcare delivery and payment."
  • Mandating that reimbursement by paper checks be prohibited for payors and providers of federally funded programs, replacing them with direct deposit by December 31, 2010.
  • Expanding the FCC’s Rural Health Care Pilot for telehealth.
  • Paying providers for telehealth services.
  • Providing incentives for providers and payors to participate in HIEs and the Nationwide Health Information Network.
  • Creating a roadmap for using PHI.
View/Print Text Only View/Print Text Only

HIStalk Featured Sponsors


Currently there are "4 comments" on this Article:

  1. 25 Billion…now that’s original. Seems everybody that comes to the government trough today want 25B…I need about $2,500 to get my credit cards cleaned up, so I guess I’ll have to figure out what to do with the other 24.9999 billion, but 25B sounds about right.
    You think HIMSS with all it’s resources could have been more cretive and specific and come up with a ‘real’ number. A nice round 25 Bill makes them look like just another government porker.

  2. blablabla…give us one HCIS manadated by the Fed, one non profit payor mandated by the Fed and cut out billions in EMR initiatives.

  3. Before we start putting billions in, can we get someone to agree on what standards we are standardizing all these EMRs to? If we had that, it may be a little easier….

Subscribe to Updates



Text Ads

Report News and Rumors

No title

Anonymous online form
Rumor line: 801.HIT.NEWS



Founding Sponsors


Platinum Sponsors




























































Gold Sponsors
















Reader Comments

  • Sam Lawrence: Except in this case, coding = medical billing, not development. Though the same warning may be true...
  • BeenThere: Partners will find the savings from their cuts of coders as fools gold. There are a lot of hidden costs running an outs...
  • JC: If there is not there can be. VistA has a reference lab interface that can create the manifests/labeling and such as we...
  • Tom Cornwell: Great stuff from Dr. Jayne as usual. One small typo, last sentence of second-to-last paragraph: should be 'who's' not 'w...
  • HIT Observer: What I find most interesting here, is people defending their common practices rather than truly taking this as invaluabl...
  • Bob: There's no incentive for the provider to spend time doing a price comparison for the patient. Nor is it a good use of th...
  • Peppermint Patty: Veteran - can you clarify what was "fake "? Was something made up (definition of fake) or did you disagree with Vapo...
  • Pat Wolfram: Such a refreshing article. Thanks -- there really can be a simpler version of an acute HIT implementation. But I do ...
  • Woodstock Generation: Bravo to HIStalk's Weekender recaps and other news/opinions. I read it first thing on Monday mornings..................
  • Veteran: #fakenews...

Sponsor Quick Links