Home » Headlines » Currently Reading:

Morning Headlines 4/18/13

April 18, 2013 Headlines 1 Comment

Mostashari defends vendor fee proposal

Farzad Mostashari, MD, defends ONC’s EHR vendor fee proposal by arguing that “having an assured funding base for the agency’s certification program would reduce uncertainty for the industry.”

Lawmakers push Hagel on DoD-VA interoperability

Chuck Hagel has cancelled DoD’s RFP searching for a system to replace its homegrown AHLTA system, saying that the agency would publish clarifying plans shortly.

HIT Q1 2013 Funding and M&A Report

Mercom Capital Group just published its quarterly review of health IT investments. There was $493 million venture capital funds invested this quarter, with Health Catalyst ($41M), xG Health Solutions ($40M), and NantHealth ($31M) inking the largest deals.

Use of Smartphones to Collect Information about Health Behaviors: Feasibility Study

The CDC is doing feasibility studies to investigate potential research bias in using smartphones to collect health information from participants. Specifically, they are looking to verify that selecting only participants that own smartphones for a study does not result in unintentional bias.

View/Print Text Only View/Print Text Only


HIStalk Featured Sponsors

     

Currently there is "1 comment" on this Article:

  1. I don’t get the rationale for this vendor fee. Is there a precedent for another federal agency charging a similar fee? As a tax-paying company, it doesn’t seem like the government can ban a vendor from participation without paying the fee. Conversely, it is a tax on vendors, and only Congress can pass a tax. Mostashari’s comments in the link are even more perplexing. This fee leading to stability suggests vendors want and need the ONC. Vendors already pay for HIMSS to be the industry forum outside of government. If vendors have to pay ONC too, is HIMSS redundant? Does this fee represent a “pay-to-play” access fee that must be paid to participate in ONC programs? Aren’t they already supposed to be open to anyone and everyone for participation and comment, as a federally funded agency? Will a startup vendor be charged the same as a large established vendor in order to participate? Too many questions, too few answers here.







Subscribe to Updates

Search


Loading

Text Ads


Report News and Rumors

No title

Anonymous online form
E-mail
Rumor line: 801.HIT.NEWS

Tweets

Archives

Founding Sponsors


 

Platinum Sponsors


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold Sponsors


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reader Comments

  • FLPoggio: What this piece totally ignores is that you and the provider (roofer) dealt directly with each other. Now what if you ha...
  • AC: That's not an apt comparison. Imagine instead if while the roofer was doing his thing, another random roofer dropped by ...
  • HIT Girl: I've worked in EHR design & support for the last 14 years or so, and when I was hospitalized in I think 2007 I got m...
  • Joy Goodspeed: So funny about the physician card. I wrote my 3rd HL7 Lab and microbiology interface in my 20-year career this past yea...
  • Anonymous: Did you just compare Healthcare to roofing business ? Imagine a surgeon operating with a body cut open, should they take...

Sponsor Quick Links