From Iommi: “Re: Advance for Health Information Executives. Have you heard that it’s shutting down?” A couple of readers, at least one of whom should know, told me it’s going down the tubes. It’s not a great time to be in the print publication business.

From RadioGuy: “Re: meaningful use and images. Can you comment on this article?” The Medical Imaging and Technology Alliance lobbies to have EMR integration of medical images included as a criterion for meaningful use, starting in 2013. Its white paper is here (warning: PDF). I can’t say I have strong feelings about the issue, so here are my off-the-cuff reactions: (a) MITA is a medical imaging vendor trade group, so that obviously influences their point of view since getting on the list would boost sales (although that’s arguably no more biased that having EMR vendor groups involved); (b) meaningful use was intended to increase EMR adoption, but I would think imaging doesn’t require that kind of incentive; (c) both doctors and patients clearly benefit from image availability, a case not so clearly made from EMRs, so misaligned incentives aren’t in play like they are for EMRs. Bottom line for me — it’s just trade group noise, albeit with some good underlying points.

From Kalispell: “Re: 200-bed hospital. Nobody mentioned Eclipsys because it’s not possible to use them for all solutions. I worked until recently in an Eclipsys hospital and pharmacy, radiology, and ambulatory are very weak. It’s not integrated like Epic or Cerner, say from radiology to SCM. Eclipsys doesn’t see billing as a primary role, so ancillaries will run into billing issues.” Unverified. I’d still rank it #1 for CPOE and clin doc, though. Another reader says Eclipsys doesn’t price Sunrise cheap enough for a 200-bed hospital.

From Arclight: “Re: you scooped the Miami Herald. An article popped up on the Miami Herald’s breaking news page 20 minutes ago about the death of PC inventor Ed Roberts. Breaking news? Really? Three days after it was posted on HIStalk? I have no idea how you manage to track and tabulate the freakish amount of data you condense for your loyal readers, but please keep up the good work. Your site should be required reading for anyone remotely connected to the HIS industry.” Thanks. I’m glad Ed didn’t go unnoticed. He may not have profited from the industry like Bill Gates, but he made it possible. 

From Diego: “Re: meaningful use final rule. Any idea when it will be final?” The comment period ended three weeks ago, but I don’t know how long it takes to review and incorporate those recommendations. Someone out there probably does and can share.

 

From Mark Moffitt: “Re: CDR/HIE model.” Image above – funny! Just in case the parody isn’t clear, it makes fun of reposing a local copy of patient data that’s already available at other locations, the equivalent of Google’s actually storing Web content rather than simply pointing to it.

Larry Nathanson MD, a BIDMC ED informatics doc, reviews the iPad for clinical app use, saying it lives up to high expectations and makes the iPhone seem “slow and inadequate.” He says it renders browser pages as fast as a laptop, supports easy typing, and hits close to the claimed 10-hour battery life. His only concern for ED use is durability. A commenter also reminds that Citrix Receiver and LogMeIn are both available for the iPad, allowing it to be used as a remote PC with full capability. Their ED app is Forerun EDIS, co-developed by BIDMC.

The usual reminders: put your e-mail in the Subscribe to Updates box to your right to get instant notification when something new is posted here (some of the 5,450 subscribers are probably your most feared competitors and you don’t want them to know first, do you?) There’s a search box over there too (and a new one coming – I bought a new search engine and am finishing up the installation). Your news, rumors, and opinions are always welcome (and will stay anonymous if you want). Make sure to read the interesting comments posted after each article and feel free to add your own. You can post your industry events to my calendar, catch up with mobile healthcare computing on HIStalk Mobile, and help me out by perusing the sponsor ads to your left and click those of interest. I genuinely appreciate your taking the time to read HIStalk.

NHS scales back its contract with BT, limiting the number of London trusts that can get Cerner and RiO. Scrapped: an ambulance solution and the previously acclaimed Map of Medicine visual care planning tool.

A reader sent a link to the full text version of the Health Affairs article in which David Brailer interviews David Blumenthal (ONCHIT-1 and ONCHIT-3, respectively). I notice Brailer’s bio omits his main credential that got him the ONCHIT job in the first place – starting up the Santa Barbara Project, a failed RHIO that started the whole interoperability craze, but died an ugly death without having ever exchanged even a single byte of information. Anyway, the article is definitely worth a read. Some snips:

• A good Blumenthal quote: “The purpose of health information technology is to support health reform, and it is part of that larger puzzle. It is not a stand-alone goal or an end in itself.”
• Interesting trivia: Blumenthal says it was Congress, not his office, that coined the term “meaningful use".
• Blumenthal says his office is working with other countries to begin discussions about international standards for sharing healthcare information.
• Brailer asks about lessons to be learned from NHS projects in England and gets an excellent and insightful answer. “One thing that is quite clear to me as I sit in the Hubert H. Humphrey Building in Washington is that no country — none of our Western peers — has attempted to create electronic health information for a country as large, diverse, complicated, wealthy, and dynamic as the United States.We are trying to create a nationwide, interoperable, private, and secure health information system for a country that extends from the Bering Straits to Key West, with more than 300 million people who by history and tradition and culture value local autonomy and need autonomy in order to manage their diverse local situations. And so that’s the tradition we inherit, that’s the method that we have to use, and we are working within those constraints.”

People mistakenly think the VA’s VistA was cheap to create since internal programmers did some of the work. It wasn’t, but it provided good ROI: a study by the Center for IT Leadership says VistA cost $4 billion over 10 years, but returned savings of $7 billion. The conclusion is that the VA spent more than a similar private sector organization would have, but got higher adoption and better care as a result (and low cost isn’t much consolation if you can’t get those things, of course). Nearly all the cost savings came from a reduction in duplicate tests and medical errors. And the good news, of course, is that your hospital can get that $4 billion system for $0 from Medsphere or some of the other companies that offer it license-free.

Listening: Metric,female-fronted indie from Canada, reader recommended. It’s so cool that readers suggest something I like about 80% of the time, which is saying a lot since I dislike 90% of what’s out there. Metric is a keeper. Try Satellite Mind on the player.

Catholic Health Services of Long Island files a certificate of need to spend $144 million on Epic for its five hospitals. It hopes to save $40 million a year in addition to the HITECH incentives, expecting length of stay to drop by a half-day.

The CIO of CMS says that companies that ask to link to its systems have such primitive IT security that it’s “almost embarrassing” and those systems are loaded with “basic amateur problems.” She says these are big-name companies, not mom-and-pops.

E-mail me.

HERtalk by Inga

From Cherry Blossom: “Re: Apple OS4. If you thought iPhone and iPad was big in healthcare, just wait until this summer. We haven’t dug into the guts of OS4, but if they can deliver on half of they have promised, the chains have been removed from developers and we are going to see some AMAZING apps.”  Well, I hope you are right in terms of improvements for app developers. In terms of simple end-users like me, I was glad to see that OS4 will support multi-tasking. The addition of unified e-mail is also a plus and something I’ll find handy as I float between my Inga World and Real Life. Bummer that Flash still is not an option, though.

HCA is preparing to file for  IPO that could yield $2.5 to $3 billion. About three years, ago HCA went private in a $33 billion leveraged buyout; an IPO would allow HCA pay off some of its ginormous $25.7 billion debt.

Allscripts releases its third quarter numbers: revenue of $179.9 million versus last year’s $160.7 million, which beats analyst estimates of $175 million. Profit came in at $18.5 million versus last year’s $13.3 million. Bookings grew 25% to $105.5 million.

I chatted with Allscripts CEO Glen Tullman a few days before the earnings’ announcement and he shared some thoughts on the Allscripts-Misys merger, one year later. He also provided his impressions on a few competitors (he believes Epic is “anti-innovation”), on industry consolidation (he sees “substantial” consolidation ahead). and Regional Extension Centers (he’s a fan).

MedQuist continues to lobby the Washington crowd to ensure that transcription is an acceptable method for getting information into EHRs.

Speaking of transcription, a reader sent over a newsletter by John Suender, who our reader claims is “THE guru of medical transcription M&A.” Suender speculates on what will happen with Spheris, which is in the midst of seeking bidders for a bankruptcy sale. His prediction: the most likely bidders are MedQuist, Nuance, and Transcend. He also estimates the new owner will pay around $125 million.

RelayHealth earns certification for its Payor Connectivity Services from the CAQH Committee on Operating Rules for Information Exchange (CORE) Phase II. The CORE certification means that RelayHealth’s provider customers can securely process electronic queries within 20 seconds and receive consistent patient administrative information.

Streamline Health Solutions announces Q4 net income of $1.59 million compared to the previous year’s net loss of $145k. Revenues came in at $6.28 million vs. $3.38 million.

Streamline Health also shares news of a new contract with East Orange General Hospital (NJ), which will implement Streamline’s health document workflow solution integrated with the hospital’s GE Centricity system.

Quality Systems makes Forbes annual list of America’s 25 Fastest-Growing Tech Companies, coming in at #23. I noticed that Red Hat also made the list at #19. To qualify, companies must have at least $25 million in sales, plus sales growth of at least 10% over the latest 12 months.

Doctors Hospital at Renaissance (TX) selects Encore Health Resources to provide project management, consulting, and advisory services for its implementation of Cerner clinicals.

HEALTHeLINK, the Western New York Clinical Information Exchange, selects Anakam Identity Suite to provide its authentication and identity management solution.

QuadraMed announces the general availability of its ICD-10 Simulator, developed to help coders prepare for the transition to ICD-10. Quantim ICD-10 Coding Simulator duplicates the ICD-10 coding environment to facilitate training. (Someone will need to explain what “Quantim” means.)

Central Washington Hospital goes live on its $22 million Cerner EHR.

Congrats to TELUS, parent company of HIStalk sponsor TELUS Health, for winning the 2010 Freeman Philanthropic Services Award for being the top philanthropic organization in the world.

Hennepin Healthcare System (MN) licenses Mediware’s Insight performance management software solution for its 900-bed hospital and clinic system.

E-mail Inga.

 View/Print Text Only

John D. Halamka, MD, MS, is chief information officer of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; chief information officer at Harvard Medical School; chairman of the New England Healthcare Exchange Network (NEHEN); chair of the US Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP)/co-chair of the HIT Standards Committee; and a practicing emergency physician.

How would you describe, if you had just a couple of minutes, how stimulus funding will change healthcare IT as an industry?

If I look at my own region, we have docs who were all waiting on electronic health record implementation because there wasn’t a value proposition. They said, well, gee, you know I can get this Stark safe harbor, I know the hospital can help out, but still, my office manager’s going to quit. I’m going to lose productivity for three months … what a hassle.

Now with the HIT stimulus funding, they say, “Wait a minute. I get 85% funded by the hospital and I get to keep the $44,000 when this is all done? OK, where do I sign up?” It’s truly accelerating physician adoption by motivating them to move forward.

What I really like about Meaningful Use is it is constructed so that the doctors are paid only when they’re done. That is, it isn’t go buy hardware and software and it’s going to be Christmas for vendors. It’s the fact that docs then have to e-prescribe, and docs are going to have to share data with patients, and docs are going to have to use quality measures. Only when you do that do you get paid.

The mindset of the clinician is, “Ah, I’m going to do it, and now I know exactly what I have to do. Help me out.” So I, as a hospital organization and my community, can work together to make all that happen. It’s an alignment of industry, academia, and practices like I’ve never seen before.

Do you think there’s a risk that they’ll get enticed enough to at least start the journey, but then because of usability issues or just lack of time, it will never really go anywhere?

I wrote a blog, which some people have criticized me for, that said I actually trust ONC. David Blumenthal and the gang he has put together are very good people. If what they discover is that, as we are actually rolling this thing out that there are barriers, then I believe they’re going to help everybody work through the barriers.

I really don’t think that this is a disconnected ONC that is going to force us to do things that are too hard and are going to first, people, as you described, to begin the journey and then fall off. What they’ll say is, “We’ll build the toolkit. We’ll help with the accelerators. We’ll break down the barriers. We’ll make sure you have the resources.” I actually feel good about people getting to the finish line.

Do you think it was a mistake to combine what should be a fairly thoughtful introduction of electronic health records with the urgency of stimulus funding?

My experience in healthcare IT is, unless you create a sense of urgency, nothing gets done. I would rather see us all move forward with great haste and get as far as we can, then along the way do a mid-course correction, than to say, “You know, we’re going to wait five years and then we can get it perfect.” There’s a lot to be said for moving the industry forward now.

These are not new products — they’re the same ones doctors didn’t want before. Do you think there will be some buyer’s remorse?

I love seeing the vendors react by creating new functionality. Certainly they’re much more open to healthcare information exchange and patient engagement than ever before, so in some respects, yeah. It may be products that have existed, but there are feature sets that have never existed.

Then with the modular EHR certification approach that’s been proposed, there’s a capacity for combining many EHR and EHR-lite together in a way that’ll get docs started. I think there’ll be new market entrants, but new features. I don’t think it’s going to be business as usual.

Will there be time for new market entrants given that people have to get on the train really quickly?

I’m now driving, actually, through Westborough, Mass. where eClinicalWorks is located. What I’m seeing these guys do is focus on patient portals. Something called provider-to-provider exchange. It’s like a Facebook function. They’re introducing all this new stuff very, very quickly.

I know the timeframes are crazy, but they have been able to innovate to adapt to ARRA requirements pretty rapidly. You’re seeing Athena move out its athenaClinicals product pretty rapidly. Software as a Service is becoming more and more common, and probably it’s because of thinner, Web-based Software as a Service architectures they can move fast enough to meet some of these deadlines.

What do you think is the majority of the work that needs to still be done to really get us down the path to getting potential benefits?

80% of what I do is people, training, workflow redesign, and process re-engineering. Only 20% is the technology stuff. When I write blogs about this stuff, I just focus on the workforce, focus on the people, and focus on the change management. That’s all the really hard work.

Yes, there are things that have to be done in Washington; and as you’ve seen coming out of ONC in the last week, consent models. How, if we’re going to do information exchange, do we ensure the patient controls the flow of their information? How do we do simple things like controlled substance e-prescribing, making sure that the workflow around writing Lipitor and writing OxyContin is pretty similar? How do we ensure that?

No interoperability’s ever going to be totally plug and play, but if it’s not USB drive kind of plug and play, can at least it be a couple hundred dollars, not a couple thousand dollars, to get a lab interface? It’s the work on specificity, on content, and transmission that still need to be done. All of this stuff on process transformation and workforce development, primarily, and then some of these things the Policy Committee and Standards Committee are doing on privacy, doing things like e-prescribing clean up and making the standards easier to use and more prescriptive.

Do you think federal funding makes it too easy to forget there are workflow changes involved?

I just met with these folks at Lawrence General and they had thought they were ready to go into a procurement phase. I said, well, let’s look at what Meaningful Use really requires. You know, what is your strategy for your local public health interface? What is your strategy for bi-directional data exchange for the community? “Oh yeah, this is a whole lot about workflow, isn’t it? It’s not about bits and bytes.”

As people begin to understand Meaningful Use, they really will understand the community and the workflow and not just the products.

You mentioned privacy. Are there currently debates going on about what form that should take or who should be involved?

I think there are two kinds of architectures that will protect privacy. One of my favorites, of course, is the idea that the medical home, the patient, becomes the steward of their own data. We send the data to them and they elect privacy preferences — who and what they’re going to share with.

Alternatively, of course, there is the clinician-to-clinician exchange. That is really going to require a persistent declaration of patient privacy preferences as to OK, if I the patient am not going to directly control it, how can I declare my preferences of those who do exchange data; whether it’s providers, payers, public health, etc. always use my declared privacy preferences when data is being exchanged?

The HIT Standards Committee, over the course of the next few months, is going to be taking testimony on what standards exist that will help support such a thing. That in combination with work on the policy side and such things as the consent white paper, I hope get us to a place where either EHR to EHR or EHR/PHR/EHR exchanges are ultimately controlled by patient preference.

You mentioned that a lot of data will be collected and exchanged. When will we start seeing the benefit of all the EHR-created data that isn’t out there now, and who do you think will use that to advance the practice of medicine?

Of course, 2011 is more about getting the data in electronic form to begin with; and 2013 more about getting data exchanged. But some beacon communities. some early adopters, I think, by 2011 are going to have substantial improvements in data sharing.

In the Boston area, I funded the creation of a quality registry for 1,560 providers that are loosely affiliated with Beth Israel Deaconess so that we begin to do all of our pay-for-performance, all of our PQRI and Meaningful Use reporting, as a community, rather than as a bunch of individual point-to-point connections. We’re doing public health reporting for the city of Boston in a common way as a community. All of this will be live in 2011. So for some, 2011. For many, 2013. For the majority, 2015.

Do you think there should be a relationship between having more technology and being able to deliver care less expensively?

That is a very good point. What we all want to achieve is high-value care where reimbursement is based on quality rather than quantity. I think the answer to your question is a couple-fold, but everything that I do these days is Software as a Service. I’m able to deliver an EHR at a lower cost than normal because the fact that I have so many clinicians sharing resources, sharing a data center, and sharing interfaces.

My hope is that I can at least, from my IT perspective, reduce the cost of implementing Meaningful Use. Then, we will gather data from a quality perspective that can be used in accountable care organizations and new mechanisms of reimbursement so that, as you pointed out, reimbursement will be fair based on the outcomes that are achieved.

Do you think technology is ready to help offset or mitigate in some way the shortage of primary care physicians?

This is an excellent point. What you hope, coming out of healthcare reform, is differential payments for primary caregivers and accountable care organizations. If I look at the Harvard Medical School experience, the number of folks going into specialty or procedural areas far exceeds those going into primary care. If you’re going to have effective reform, if you’re going to have lower costs, we need more primary caregivers.

Sure, as you point out, maybe technology can help us use extenders wisely so that whether that is some tasks can be delegated to nurse practitioners, physician assistants; some decision support can be offered in the Cloud so that we are delivering coordinated and better care more effectively by using technology rather than physician time for every intervention. All of this still presupposes that we have the primary caregivers who can actually be at the center of the medical home. In my view, you need to redo reimbursement so that the primary caregiver is the one making more than the specialist, not vice versa.

What about telemedicine?

We use telemedicine today to connect rural or community hospitals or emergency departments with downtown Boston for the provision of such things as stroke consultation in real-time for the administration of TPA in stroke. You’re able to leverage the academic health vendor in a far greater reach through the use of telemedicine.

I’ve had a lot of experimentation with remote visits, home monitoring, and again, leveraged telemedicine as a mechanism of making a primary care physician more efficient. Actually, the patients like it because they don’t have to travel into the city. Or, doing interventions like measuring blood pressure, measuring daily weight, and then having a team of nurses doing home care remotely and keep people out of the hospital. I certainly agree that telemedicine can have a role in reducing cost and using time more efficiently.

What do you think the Nationwide Health Information Network is going to look like and when will we start seeing it deliver benefits?

You’re probably familiar with the NHIN Direct efforts that have been kicked off over the last two weeks. The idea of a NHIN, obviously, it’s a set of policies and some open source technologies in reference to implementation to exchange data among various participants and provider, payer, government, etc. In NHIN Direct, the idea that there are some interactions that are simpler — pushing between two doctors, pushing to the patient.

Actually, what you hope is if this becomes a fairly thin, Web-based mechanism of sending data from point to point at very low cost. Here’s an idea. What if every person who wanted to participate in a patient/doctor exchange could sign up for a healthcare URL? Many people — Microsoft, Google, Dossia, who knows, various software vendors — could offer this health URL and all you need to use it is you take it to your doctor and say, “Doctor, here’s my health URL. Every time there’s an entry in my record in your office, push the data to this health URL.” There’s no HIE, there’s no transaction fee, there’s not a lot of complex business structure needed. It’s just an HTTPS post.

What I hope is that sure, for governments, for larger organizations, there will still be a NHIN that has quite a lot of security in its infrastructure, But you hope for a lot of connections that can be as simple as the home banking connection you have with an HTTPS post and it just bakes right in to every EHR.

Some of the folks that have gone into federal service work lately are interesting, like Todd Park and Don Berwick. What do you think that means that people who aren’t lifelong civil servants are popping up out of the private sector and going into federal work?

Knowing Aneesh and Todd and Don Berwick pretty well, these are people who have passion. They’re now able to see change is possible and resources are available. I think they believe that, in the current administration and the current time in history, it’s not business as usual and they’re willing to put in their energy and their passion to making change.

That’s why I write in my blog, these truly are the good old days of healthcare IT. I know I’m putting a significant portion of my time into state and federal efforts on a volunteer basis just because I believe I can make a difference.

You mentioned that you have a lot of respect for ONC as an insider to this whole process. Was the outcome what an idealistic person would have expected, or was this such an ugly compromise that nobody leaves happy?

I will tell you, sitting in the HIT Standards Committee and the Policy Committee and on calls with ONC; the amount of positive energy, as opposed to the amount of negative energy and compromise, is totally different than any other process I’ve been involved in in the past. People who have very different opinions come together and they say, “God, here’s what I want to achieve to improve patient care and quality and efficiency.” Everyone says, “Well, there’s two or three ways we could do it.” I’ve seen harmony rather than ugly compromise come out of each of these processes. That’s why I’m very optimistic.

When you look at your own organization, what are your biggest challenges and highest priorities at Beth Israel Deaconess?

I’ve laid out a 25-step plan to implement Meaningful Use across the organization. The hardest part of it is it is not just one actor. It is not just a hospital in an island. It’s ensuring that you have trust in your community so that you can do these data exchanges across the various providers, public health, payers, and government. It’s been relationship-building more than technology implementation, in my 25 projects, that’s my hard work.

Is there anything else you wanted to talk about?

I just have to say that you do a great service for humanity. Somebody has made this comment to me, that you have become not the National Enquirer, but The New York Times of our industry. It’s built on transparency. People, just like all the stuff I’m trying to work on, are no longer afraid of this special interest or that special interest. It’s everybody opening up and just trying to get the job done. I think you’ve been a big part of that.

 View/Print Text Only

From Dirt Farmer: “Re: iPad in healthcare. Since it’s a closed system, some non-Apple proprietary CPOE, EMR, and imaging apps may not run on it. Therefore, its use might be limited. Flash doesn’t work on any Apple device, but an Adobe rep tells me the company hopes to announce a relationship in 2011.”

From Jerry: “Re: system for a 200-bed hospital. No mention of Eclipsys. Is there a reason?” I don’t know much about their capabilities outside of their obvious strengths in CPOE and nursing documentation — the hospital was looking for a soup-to-nuts solution that covered everything from billing to ancillaries. None of the respondents mentioned them, either. If you work in a hospital of that size and are running an all-Eclipsys lineup, why not send me a little writeup of what you’re doing and how it’s working? I’m interested.

From Werner: “Re: system for a 200-bed hospital. Why didn’t Eclipsys show up? A very nice solution especially if looking ahead to meaningful use AND they have a remote hosted solution. What about OpenVista, a proven solution for smaller facilities and no major license cost (of course , except for ISM & extensions)?” Eclipsys, see above. I had OpenVista on my list originally, but couldn’t decide if it made sense for a hospital that needs a full set of applications and potentially a lot of hand-holding for implementation and maintenance, even if OpenVista would have minimal licensing costs. I could be persuaded, though.

From Midwest CIO: “Re: system for a 200-bed hospital. The way you phrased it, their only option is Paragon. It’s all Microsoft, so it’s easy to find resources to support it and it has a long life in front of it. I would put Keane on par with Paragon with respect to clinical functionality.”

The local newspaper writes up the Paragon go-live of Auburn Memorial Hospital (NY).

University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey’s behavioral care organization chooses DSS to implement its vxVistA, an open source variant of the VA’s VistA.

A Harvard doctor creates an iPad application that allows him to monitor patient breathing via an ultrasound sensor he invented. He sees potential for using it to check asthmatic patients in their homes and to monitor sleeping infants.

The Army’s MC4 group is piloting a new version of the Theater Medical Data Store (TMDS) in Afghanistan that can also display the service member’s pre-deployment medical history from AHLTA.

Former RelayHealth VP Bob Katter joins First DataBank as VP of sales and marketing.

Lee Memorial Hospital (FL), expecting ARRA money to cover up to $40 million of its $70 million Epic implementation cost, finds that it isn’t eligible for up to $10 million of that taxpayer-funded windfall because it shares a Medicare provider number with its physician group. Congressman Connie Mack IV, who opposed the stimulus bill and yet is appalled that LMH might get less of it, says the hospital “shouldn’t be penalized for CMS’ interpretation of the definition of a hospital.”

HHS secretary Kathleen Sebelius visits Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, admiring its $47 million Epic system and its patient portal.

Which reminds me: whatever happened to White House healthcare reform director and former Cerner board member Nancy Ann-DeParle? Healthcare reform was a hot topic, but I don’t recall seeing her name even once in the past several months (and a Google search backs me up on that).

Jobs: Epic Inpatient EMR Manager, Cerner Orders Consultant, EMR Implementation Specialist.

Health Affairs devotes its entire April issue to healthcare IT topics, although only subscribers can see most of it. It didn’t sound all that interesting, although I would have read David Brailer’s interviewed with his eventual ONCHIT replacement David Blumenthal (although I doubt anything controversial was said).

Odd medical problem: a man orders his favorite restaurant sandwich, the five-meat, three-cheese Wicked, except with double meat to celebrate his son’s performance in a talent show. His mouth locks up trying to take the first bite, at which time he begins punching his own jaw trying to loosen it up. He required surgical repair of double dislocation of the mandible.

E-mail me.

HERtalk by Inga

From Marge Schott: “Re: Streamline Health. In an SEC filing, the company said it won’t be renewing its contract with its sales SVP Scott Boyden. Probably a cost cutting move since Streamline continues to lose money.”

Centegra Health System (IL) says its Kronos workforce management software has saved the system over $1.6 million in labor costs. Centegra uses time and attendance and employee scheduling solutions, which have helped eliminate agency use and reduce overtime by 30%.

Blessing Hospital (IL) and University Health System of San Antonio earn Magnet Recognition by the American Nurses Credentialing Center for excellence in nursing and for providing high quality patient care at all levels of the hospital. Both facilities use Eclipsys.

Speaking of Eclipsys, the company is selected  by The Methodist Hospital of Houston to provide its HealthXchange product. HealthXchange, which is powered by Medicity, will connect Methodist’s acute care EHR with a network of disparate EHRs used by affiliated physicians. 

Picis extends its Microsoft Gold Certified Partner status with specialized competencies in business intelligence and data management solutions.

MedQuist partners with Artificial Medical Intelligence to provide computer-assisted coding within the MedQuist CodeRunner coding workflow platform.

HealthPort announces a money-back guarantee that its EHR software will meet certification requirements for Meaningful Use. Nothing against HealthPort, but I am done mentioning any of these money-back guarantees. I’ll quit worrying that there are still naive providers out there who believe that just because their software is “guaranteed” that they will be “guaranteed” stimulus money.

Thumbs up to Virginia, which becomes the 12th state to require health insurers to cover telemedicine services provided through interactive audio, video, or other media.

Auditors for LSU’s charity-run hospital system finds that its clinic overpaid an outside patient billing firm almost $350,000, while about $8.2 million in patient services were never billed. On top of that, LSU Interim Public Hospital has lost track of movable property originally worth $3.8 million. The overpayment occurred in 2007 when billing firm Healthcare Financial Services double-billed an invoice, both of which Medical Center of LA-NO paid. Less than half the money was recouped two years later. Of the $8.2 million never billed, about $1 million is still recoverable. Not surprisingly, leaders say new checks are being put in place.

AnMed Health (SC) picks Allscripts EHR for its 60 employed physicians and 40 affiliated physicians. AnMed currently provides Allscripts Tiger PM in a hosted model for the physicians and will offer the EHR through a similar setup.

Mercy Health Systems (PA) plans to implement NextGen EHR for its 70 providers across 31 locations. Later in 2010, Mercy will also deploy NextGen Health Information Exchange. The providers have used NextGen Practice Management for almost four years.

John Muir Health (CA) notifies almost 5,500 patients of a potential data breach following the theft of two laptops from a physician office. The hospital says the laptops were in a locked and guarded building and were password protected,  but did not have data encryption. Encryption software is now being installed on all the health system’s laptops.

Evolvent Technologies awards Harris Corporation an 10-month follow-on contract for ongoing enhancements to the DoD’s Healthcare Artifact and Image Management Solution (HAIMS) system.

Unity Medical says it will pilot its new Medical Video jLog for the Apple iPad at Florida Hospital for Children at Walt Disney Pavilion and St. Luke’s Health System (ID). The company provides short interactive videos that provide patients with an explanation of common procedures and treatments.

Passport Health Communications launches eCare Patient Access Suite, designed to help hospitals improve workflow and increase revenues.

E-mail Inga.

 View/Print Text Only

Submit your article of up to 500 words in length, subject to editing for clarity and brevity (please note: I run only original articles that have not appeared on any Web site or in any publication and I can’t use anything that looks like a commercial pitch). I’ll use a phony name for you unless you tell me otherwise. Thanks for sharing!

Has Meaningful Use Already Lost All Meaning?
By Cynthia Porter

The release earlier this year of expanded meaningful use requirements has gotten the healthcare IT community in quite a tizzy. The phrase was on everyone’s lips before, during, and after HIMSS. It was obvious to me
that:

1. Everyone has a strong opinion about it;
2. Not everyone understands it; and
3. The recent passing of healthcare reform has left providers extremely anxious about how they and the vendors they do business with will comply with “it”, depending on what “it” ultimately turns out to be.

I know for a fact that hospital executives’ concerns about their institutions’ abilities to meet requirements and the overly aggressive timetables released as part of the expanded meaningful use requirements has increased exponentially since 2009, when the HITECH Act was initially released.

Nearly 80 percent of 150 hospital executives recently surveyed by Porter Research noted an increased rate of adoption for e-prescribing, patient portals, and EHRs. That’s a 20% increase from 2009, before the expanded requirements were published. So it’s safe to say that providers are jumping on the bandwagon.

Most, however, are worried that the wheels are going to fall off because vendors won’t have enough qualified employees and/or up-to-date resources to meet demand and requirements. One CIO we interviewed believes vendors “will be forced to spend more programming hours around the interoperability and security of their software versus the primary function, which is taking care of patients and making it easier for clinicians to utilize.”

And there’s the rub. Sure, the healthcare IT community will probably benefit from the political machinations going on in Washington, but will the patients? Will vendors rush to provide hospitals with technologies that could have used a few more months of development and trial? Will hospital staff have time to adequately train their IT people to use these new technologies? Will patients pay the price for a rush job?

It’s unfortunate that time will tell, because time is one thing patients don’t have.

Cynthia Porter is president of Porter Research.

Health Reform, Schmealth Reform – Freakin’ Pay Me
By Gregg Alexander

Down here in the primary care trenches, where the pudding meets the pavement (or some such mixed analogy), no matter how much we may want it to, health reform doesn’t seem like it will ever really get to addressing our needs.

What do I mean by that? Simple enough: it is getting virtually impossible to justify staying in traditional primary care any more and, health reform or no, HITECH or no, Congress just walked away and forgot about me and mine.

Despite our efforts to help bring the best we can to those we serve, what do we get? People, be they private insurers or Medicaid, self-pay or no-pay, hospitals, and even IT folks, all telling us what we can and can’t do. We’re told when we are and aren’t allowed to make medical recommendations based upon our knowledge and experience and then we’re told just how much we’re allowed to charge for our expertise. (Disregard whether or not we’ll even get paid anything at all for our time and trouble.)

We fight to get what we believe is appropriate care for our patients, regardless of their insurance or lack thereof. We struggle to make ends meet so that we can offer the advantages of a quality medical home and, perhaps, digital healthcare information management to our patients. We work far too many hours, away from our family and friends, just so we can feel good enough to sleep at night knowing we have done our best to help those who come to us for care.

And then…and then…Congress goes on break before postponing a 21.3% cut in Medicare payments. (Thank you, Senator Tom Coburn, R-OK.) Whether or not they repeal it when they return, CMS will likely withhold payments for at least 10 days before beginning to process those 21.3% reduced payments. For those affected, continuing this Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula is anything but sustainable and quite the opposite of growth.

Ladies and gentlemen, if you’re not already aware, we have a shortage of primary care providers in America. Pushing us toward expensive technology adoption which may or may not truly be ready to really meet OUR needs while reducing the bottom-of-the-barrel payments with which we already struggle, is not going to solve any little piece of our giant healthcare crisis. It will make it much worse as more and more of us leave for less stressful and less beyond-our-control professional lives. All the while, we’ll leave little encouragement for the med school up-and-comers who will doubtful choose to join the ranks of careworn primary care.

Let us worry about dealing with the pressures of making medical decisions and allow us a reasonable income which doesn’t add to the strain. Elsewise…well…how long would you stick around after a 21% pay cut?

From the (weary) trenches…

“Pay me for my work, but I don’t do it for the money.” – Vanna Bonta

Dr. Gregg Alexander, a grunt in the trenches pediatrician, directs the “Pediatric Office of the Future” exhibit for the American Academy of Pediatrics and is a member of the Professional Advisory Council for ModernMedicine.com. More of his blather…er, writings…can be found at his blog, practice web site or directly from doc@madisonpediatric.com.

This Just In: HIRE Bill Signed! Could Hiring Tax Breaks Benefit Your Organization?
By Tiffany Crenshaw

On March 18, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act (HIRE). HIRE is a $17.5 billion jobs bill that the President says will bolster hiring and incent business owners, creating approximately 250,000 new jobs.

The bill was dramatically scaled back as it passed through the House and Senate, from $150 billion to less than $20 billion. Still, lawmakers say it is the first step in a series of bills designed to encourage job growth.

The Act offers two tax breaks to companies who hire recently unemployed workers, one in the form of a payroll tax exemption and the other in the form of a tax credit. Beginning March 19 and through the remainder of 2010, employers will not have to pay the 6.2% Social Security payroll tax on qualifying new hires. In addition, companies are entitled to a credit equal to 6.2% of an eligible employee’s total salary (up to $1,000) if that new hire is retained for at least 52 weeks consecutively.

To qualify for the tax breaks, new employees must be hired between February 3, 2010, and January 1, 2011. Each new hire must verify in writing that he or she was unemployed for a minimum of 60 consecutive days just prior to being hired. If the worker is replacing an employee in the same job role, he or she is not eligible, unless the previous employee was terminated for cause or voluntarily quit.

There is no doubt that these incentives may not help all companies, but HIRE is a start that could benefit your organization as well as the nation’s unemployment rate. Companies still experiencing depressed revenues due to economic slowdown may not benefit from the tax incentives, but others may find the tax savings to be a valuable advantage towards savings and growth.

Tiffany Crenshaw is CEO of Intellect Resources.

 View/Print Text Only

ONCHIT announces $60 million in new grants (sounds like chicken feed in these stimulus-happy days, doesn’t it?) University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign will look at security, Universe of Texas Health Science Center will study patient-centered cognitive support, Harvard takes on application and network architectures, and Mayo will review secondary use of EHR data while maintaining security and privacy. The last one sounds the most interesting to me.

Merge Healthcare sells $42 million of stock in a private placement to help pay for its proposed acquisition of Amicas.

Former QuadraMed VP Chris Callahan joins Sunquest as VP of product management.

Bill Gates composes a fascinating remembrance of Ed Roberts, inventor of the Altair computer and therefore the father of the PC, who died last week at 68. Of course, Bill and Paul Allen kind of screwed Ed legally to get the rights to sell BASIC to other companies even though they had sold Ed an exclusive license, but I guess Bill’s being sentimental now that he’s earned billions from it. I knew but maybe you didn’t that Ed was a country doctor in Georgia, having gone to med school at 41 and finishing first in his class after selling out his computer business in 1977.

Next, on a very special episode of Weird News Andy: two North Carolina doctors are reprimanded for performing a C-section on a woman who wasn’t pregnant. A resident misdiagnosed her “false pregnancy”, the docs tried for two days to induce labor without success, and they finally opened her up only to find no baby. Nobody had bothered to verify that she was indeed pregnant. In their defense, the resident supervision was complicated and false pregnancies are apparently quite believable without diagnostic verification.

Most of us agree that patients should control the use of their health information, although the question of “to what degree” would likely be more contentious. New poll to your right: what impact will the iPad have in healthcare?

CMS auditors conclude that “alarm fatigue” caused by incessant monitor beeping contributed to a patient’s death at Mass General in January. They also found that the patient’s bedside crisis alarm had been turned off. In response, the hospital has disabled the “off” buttons, put more speakers in nursing stations, and assigned nurses to watch monitors full time. While they were there, the Medicare inspectors also wrote up privacy violations, including having patient names on whiteboards and positioning in-room video monitors so that they were visible to visitors.

A two-year-old dies from a heparin overdose at Nebraska Medical Center. The hospital implements the usual after-the-fact changes that sound good, but really aren’t sustainable even for high-alert drugs like heparin: requiring a second nurse to verify the dose, having pharmacy observe the initiation of the bag, and turn on a hard stop on the infusion pumps.

Nuance announces availability of Dragon Dictation for iPad, available for free from the Apple App Store. It supports dictation and sending e-mails by voice.

E-mail me.

Recommended System for a 200-Bed Hospital with Minimal IT Resources

A reader asked me about which systems I would recommend for a 200-bed community hospital with minimal IT resources. Specifically mentioned were McKesson Paragon, Meditech 6.0, and Cerner Millennium. I assume the hospital wants a broad set of applications ranging from revenue cycle to CPOE. My answer, in essence, was this:

• I would definitely choose Paragon over Cerner, especially if there’s no legacy billing system that will be retained (Cerner ProFit is still problematic, I think). McKesson has done a good job in bringing Paragon back from its near-death experience and the field reports, while limited, are good. I think Cerner would be overkill for a 200-bed hospital.
• However, if billing isn’t important, then Cerner’s remote hosted product should at least be considered, even though it’s probably far more complex and than a 200-bed hospital would need. Cerner is notorious for coming well down from list price when pressed since they aren’t selling many new customers, so I wouldn’t pay much of a premium for it. It would also offer a lot capability for the future.
• Meditech 6.0 is a bit of an unknown since it’s new, but if CPOE is a criterion (as it probably should be), that’s the Meditech version they would want. Company performance has slipped a bit, but they are still eminently solid.
• I mentioned that CPSI is strong in that bed range, but that I don’t really know too much about their products.
• I suggested that for a different perspective, the hospital might want to take a look at IntraNexus Sapphire, which offers something a bit fresher than those obvious choices even though it’s not a big company like the others.

So I would rank them Paragon, Meditech 6.0, and remotely hosted Cerner. I didn’t rank Sapphire, but I would still give it a look.

I got 25 reader responses, summarized as follows.

• Most respondents, especially the CIOs, suggested Meditech.
• One comment said that Meditech is straightforward and easy to manage, with 6.0 getting good reviews. That reader also asked me about CPOE adoption. The HIMSS Analytics presentation at HIMSS showed a definite improvement in physician adoption under 6.0 vs. Magic. I think CPOE is important even though Meaningful Use so far requires only 10% penetration, so I don’t know if choosing Magic would make sense.
• A hospital CFO recommended Meditech without hesitation based on personal experience in three hospitals of under 300 beds, where Meditech replaced Siemens, McKesson, and Cerner. He said that Meditech beats Siemens and McKesson on functionality and cost (he didn’t name the specific McKesson product line, which could be Paragon, Series, or Star).
• A consultant also recommended Meditech, saying it’s generic, easy to install, requires minimal training, and requires low maintenance.
• A CIO said it’s Meditech hands down, “not the most advanced, but it will keep you out of trouble.” That’s a solid point – nobody fails with Meditech, so they get an implicit cost advantage due to reduced risk.
• An IT person from a 100-bed hospital provided an informative comment about Meditech C/S, to which the hospital had migrated two years ago from best-of-breed systems. They are very happy to have traded interfaces for integration. Putting in Meditech increased the IT staff from five to 10 employees.
• A CIO recommended Meditech, but said it won’t be cheap and 6.0 may still have kinks. He says Paragon’s functionality is a step up from Meditech, but that CPOE may not have been released yet. He also made a good point: Meditech is so widely deployed that it’s much easier to find independent implementation people.
• A consultant recommended CPSI, Healthland, and Meditech on the basis of integrating administrative, financial, and clinical applications without a lot of IT overhead. However, she also cautioned that prospects should push hard to get Meaningful Use criteria in the contract. She observed, correctly I think, that it’s amazing that big vendors can’t seem to figure out how to scale their pricing and delivery to serve this large market of small hospitals, although lower price points may have cooled their interest.
• A CIO had this interesting comment: “An affiliate relationship with an existing Epic customer. You get all the benefits of Epic without having to host.”
• A hospital IT director suggested the resource issue should put the hosted Cerner suite at the top of the list.
• One reader suggested two systems that I hadn’t thought too much about: CPSI and Siemens MedSeries4. I always forget that MS4 is still around, although I would certainly find out about CPOE usage.
• A reader suggested Paragon, noting that it’s being installed in larger hospitals and doing well.
• I liked this perspective from an IT director in a hospital of similar size and IT capabilities. She said they realized that their functionality requirements weren’t much different from those of bigger hospitals and the smaller vendors backed out for that reason, so they are looking at Millennium or Siemens Soarian and options for a quick build, remote hosting, and possibly outsourcing some of the application support to the vendor.
• A hospital IT project director suggested QuadraMed QCPR, saying it hasn’t been well marketed but noting that it has lots of functionality for both inpatient and outpatient clinicals as well as ancillary departments. She also noted its track record in big hospitals, its recent award in Saudi Arabia, and its configurability and rules engine.
• A consultant says his company usually recommends Meditech and Paragon and can host either. He does not recommend Siemens because the contracts are too restrictive.
• A hospital analyst suggested Cerner.One reader ranked them as Paragon, Meditech, and CPSI.
• A consultant said his choices in order would be CPSI, Paragon, and as a low third choice, Meditech.
• One reader gave his picks as MedSeries4, Meditech, and Paragon, all from larger companies with a better chance of survival.

Thanks very much to everyone who took the time to respond. This is excellent information for the reader (and for me). We ought to do this more often.

 View/Print Text Only