An HIT Moment with ... is a quick interview with someone we find interesting. Jeffrey Levitt is chairman and CEO of Precyse Solutions.

What are the key issues involved in moving traditional HIM departments to paperless and EHR-based operations?

Without a doubt, physician adoption. Physicians want to focus on delivering quality care and avoid spending time adapting to a new system or altering their workflow.

There are many issues involved in the transformation to a paperless EHR environment. However, we often receive questions about how to manage the changes that people will have to go through. They must re-think their workflows, processes, and tools that have changed as a result of the investment in the EHR. Many have a hard time giving up things that they understand to embrace change and something new — knowing these new paperless systems may potentially result in job losses in a difficult employment environment.

Coupled with change management tasks are training and conversion issues required under the new systems and workflows. For example, to move to a new dictation and transcription platform or automated coding platform, transcriptionists, editors, and coders must receive additional training and education. At the same time, the basic core HIM functions and processes must continue, otherwise the revenue cycle will be disturbed and billing and collections will be delayed. An efficient and streamlined conversion strategy, reinforced with proven implementation methodologies, is required to minimize disruption while existing HIM employees are learning a new set of systems and procedures.

How can speech recognition be used to turn provider dictation into electronic documentation within the EHR?

Acquisition of data directly from clinicians remains one of the largest obstacles for EHR adoption and information sharing among facilities. This is caused in part by the difficulty of capturing data in a structured format. Many physicians are reluctant to document patient encounters in a structured format directly into EHR systems because they believe it will require more time, more hindrance to their established and desired workflow.

Recently, new technology has emerged with potential to bridge the gap between dictation and structured data entry. Solutions have moved from speech recognition to speech understanding, a more suited concept for the EHR decade, which allows physicians to continue documenting clinical information efficiently via natural language, which is analyzed and processed into a structured narrative in real time. A structured narrative fuses unstructured text; gross document structures like sections, fields, paragraphs, lists; and individual concepts, their modifiers and relationships — all of which are encoded using standard medical terminologies and nomenclatures.

Precyse is pleased to incorporate the M*Modal Speech Understanding technologies in our transcription platform. Utilizing the business logic in our workflow platform and M*Modal’s continuous learning process, speech profiles are established with a new physician’s first dictation, and drafts rapidly improve with continued use. Today, over 80% of our total physician dictations are seamlessly converted into useable drafts, significantly improving transcriptionists’ productivity and providing faster document turnaround. The benefits in accelerating the document generation improves communications between caregivers, can expedite the admissions and discharge processes, and accelerates the billing process to reduce DNFB, to say nothing of the increase in physician satisfaction and adoption.

What coding and documentation issues are currently challenging for HIM departments?

Almost every hospital we encounter has a shortage of qualified coders. Without the ability to code and process charts on a timely and accurate basis, the revenue cycle is disturbed while billing and collections are delayed. At the same time, medical coding is getting more complex because of new medical technologies coming online, changes to the rules of coding and coding specificity as required by MS-DRGs.

Other problems coders encounter are incomplete charts, or documents that do not contain appropriate detail. Because, to a physician, the primary purpose of clinical documentation is continuity of patient care, charts and records are often not prepared from the perspective required for properly coding provided services. With these complexities, the resulting lack of accurate and complete documentation presented to coders can result in the use of nonspecific and general codes. This impacts data integrity and reimbursement and presents potential compliance issues and recovery audit risk.

To mitigate these risks, coders have turned to time-consuming querying to clarify documentation. According to one of our clients, some of their facilities have seen up to 50% of charts submitted to coders result in needing a query back to the physician, further delaying the billing process.

Remedying this problem, many providers have looked to outside help. Experienced coders can be brought in on a contract basis, or even work in a remote setting to ease the burdens on in-house staff. Providers can also contract for coding auditors and educators, and clinical documentation specialists to work directly with physicians to help them understand the difference between clinical documentation and reimbursement documentation.

What tips would you offer for coding audit and compliance?

We urge our clients to invest in training for their coders, and are glad to assist them with the coding education function. We make a vast majority of our internal continuing education materials available to our clients, as well as our de-identified charts for coding practice and education. In those hospitals where we have responsibility for the coding function ourselves, we conduct regular mock audits in addition to our own efforts to identify improvement areas that need to be strengthened in our processes and training. We also build continuous improvement plans into our standard methods of operation. Finally, our Compliance, Privacy and Security Officers spend a lot of time in new colleague orientation and our internal compliance program ensures that we maintain and enhance our own focus on compliance.

How do you see the roles and responsibilities of the hospital HIM department changing over the next five years?

Because more hospitals will be purchasing and deploying more sophisticated EHR systems over the next few years under HITECH, many of the clerical functions will be reviewed and rethought around absence of the assembled paper chart and the introduction of the electronic record. In multi-hospital systems with size, scale and resources, these groups will begin to use the experiences they’ve gained from the regionalization and centralization of their business offices to do the same with their medical records and HIM departments. While there must always be some on-site HIM professionals to handle interdepartmental communications and address physician and patient requests for records, many of the professionals who had formerly been part of the more labor-intensive, paper-based environment at the site of care will find that their jobs have been physically moved to more centralized offices, or to their homes.

Likewise, some of these functions will have been re-engineered for greater efficiency and productivity. We also anticipate the creation of new HIM job categories for many of these workers as we begin to understand how to better extract data from the EHR systems to provide more automated reporting that will be required in our new environment. So, it wouldn’t be surprising to see whole new categories of HIM workers beginning to assist in the preparation of decision support tools, pay-for-performance and other quality reporting information, or aggregate patient information for other uses in the health care system.

It will be a very exciting decade for health care information technology and management, one that will resemble nothing of the past decade. We can thank advancing technologies and mastering new workflows for this anticipated transformation.

 View/Print Text Only

From Stifler’s Mom: “Re: Medicare. Doctors to take a pay cut. Tricare’s getting cut too.” AMA’s president decries the 21% Medicare pay cut that will hit doctors on April 1. It’s a Catch-22 situation: more patients will be insured under healthcare reform, which will eliminate the need to use hospital EDs for basic care, but the scarcity of primary care docs coupled with reduced payments means those patients will wind right back up in the ED because they won’t be able to get appointments otherwise. As long as Medicare richly rewards procedure docs while stiffing PCPs, there will by the law of supply and demand be way too few PCPs. Just giving everybody an insurance card isn’t going to solve that problem. Let’s hope Don Berwick can blast through the bureaucracy, not only at CMS, but throughout the federal government. If anyone can, I’d say it’s him. Personally, I can’t believe he took the job and I’m sure he didn’t do it to fulfill a long-held hope of becoming a bureaucrat.

From The PACS Designer: “Re: Apple’s iPad release. The wait is over. Saturday will usher in the iPad era for Apple. There will be many reviewers to tell us what they think of their new business and play tool. One of our own, the esteemed Dalai, will give us an early indication of its usefulness when he gets his iPad via a shipper from China and starts to play!” I got Mrs. HIStalk a netbook for traveling and I kind of like that, too. It will fit into a mid-sized purse, weighs next to nothing, has a battery life of over 10 hours, and hops onto a wireless network easily. It’s running Win 7 Starter, is fast, has all the hard drive you’d ever need, and sports the usual array of external ports. The keyboard feels pretty good and the display is just fine. It comes with Microsoft Works, which can read and write Word files, but I’ll hook her up with Google Docs. It’s pretty cool for less than $300.

The Charleston, SC business paper writes up Carolina eHealth Alliance’s project, in which 11 hospital EDs are exchanging information using technology from TELUS Health.

Tressa Springman, CIO of Greater Baltimore Medical Center, writes an article called Improving Clinician Communication that describes that organization’s rollout of the TeamNotes clinical documentation system from Salar, which they integrated with their incumbent EMR. “Too often, hospitals are forced to implement technologies to meet an externally mandated deadline. These are the situations where teams are faced with short-changing the required thoughtfulness of the good design, resulting in a bad system that needs to be reworked. In contrast, I feel very good about our implementation of Salar’s clinical documentation at GBMC, because I feel that we are doing it for the right reasons, at the right pace and in a quality manner driven by a high degree of physician engagement.”

Walt Disney Pavilion at Florida Hospital for Children rolls out GetWell Town from GetWellNetwork, offering patient education, entertainment, and Internet access. The company will announce an agreement tomorrow with Child Health Corporation of America that will make GetWell Town available to its 40 leading children’s hospitals.

East Orange General Hospital announces that it will implement GE Centricity Enterprise. This is an interesting quote: “East Orange General Hospital, under EOGH President Kevin Slavin, started community meetings regularly. In one of the meetings, a GE representative happened to be there and they helped introduce the system to the hospital.” Nice work by the salesperson who “happened” to show up and pitch product at a community meeting. They earned that big commission.

A reader asked me which full hospital information systems a 200-bed hospital with light IT resources should look at. I gave my answer, but I’m curious: what would yours have been? E-mail me your thoughts and I’ll compile them here and share what I said.

A doctor who made $1.5 million writing over 100,000 prescriptions for online “patients” he hadn’t examined gets five years in prison.

A good idea from HHS’s Adoption/Certification Workgroup: put feedback buttons on EHR screens so clinicians can report problems. It’s not a new idea and some systems have them, but they all should if you ask me.

E-mail me.

HERtalk by Inga

From Bad Blake: “Re: Scott Freeman. The former territory vice president at McKesson Physician Practice Solutions, has accepted the role as head of business development for Zynx Health out of Los Angeles.” I see that Scott lists the new job title in LinkedIn, even though someone else is credited with the BD title on Zynx’s website.

From Clareece Jones: “Re: Berwick over CMS. Great news for patient safety.”

Saudi Arabia National Guard Health Affairs wins the Excellence in Electronic Health Records Award for its use of QuadraMed CPR. The award, which was presented at the Arab Health Exhibition and Congress, is given to the healthcare providing making the most innovative use of EHR to reduce error and increase safety and efficiency.

A Connecticut radiologist who was terminated from his physician group accesses a hospital’s computer system and looks at images and personal data for 957 patients. The doctor then allegedly contacted some of those patients and encouraged them to seek service at a different hospital. Apparently after the doctor left the staff at the original hospital, he hacked into the DPAC system using other radiologists’ passwords. The state attorney general is investigating. If I were investigating, the first thing I’d ask is how the heck did the doctor have access to all those passwords.

Eclipsys partners with Rothman Healthcare Research to build Rothman’s Patient Condition Tracker Solution software on the Helios by Eclipsys open architecture platform. The integration will give Eclipsys hospital clients the option to use Rothman’s application in an integrated environment without needing to develop an additional interface.

CPSI’s CPOE, E-Mar, and pharmacy applications achieve “approvable” status from the Ohio Board of Pharmacy. The designation means the software can be installed in Ohio hospitals without further inspection from the Board of Pharmacy.

You can find the list of Thomson Reuters 100 Top Hospitals here. The ratings are based on public information and assess hospitals’ performance in 10 different areas. Thomson Reuters claims that more than 98,000 additional patients would survive each year if those patients received the same level of care as ones treated in Top 100 facilities.

Frederick Memorial (MD) expands its relationship with MEDSEEK to develop a comprehensive eHealth ecoSystem. I believe that is a fancy way of saying that Frederick will be combining its existing MEDSEEK physician portal with a consumer-facing Web site.

eClinicalworks says it has implemented 2,000 providers across 400 independent practices in New York City over the last two and half years. Another 600 providers and 100 practices are in the implementation process.

And in the Midwest, physician network Advocate Physician Partners partners with eClinicalWorks and will recommend eCW’s PM/EMR to its 2,600 independent physicians.

North Florida Surgeons selects Allscripts EHR/PM solution for its 34-provider practice. The practice’s CEO says that a key reason they selected Allscripts was the availability of Allscripts Patient Payment Assurance module to to calculate patient responsible amounts and secure payment authorization prior to surgery. I mentioned this in HIStalk Practice yesterday and the Allscripts folks told me that this particular module, which is offered in partnership with mPay Gateway, is proving to be a big competitive advantage.  I suppose that serves as a good reminder that clinical software is not the only thing providers are worried about these days.

Speaking of Allscripts, the former Healthmatics division president David Bond and ISTA CEO Kernie Brashier join Navicure as VP of sales and CTO, respectively. Less that a year ago Mr. H mentioned that Bond had started a social networking site for teen athletes, which I guess wasn’t as fun as the RCM biz.

The North Hawaii Health Information Exchange (NHHIE) is leveraging Wellogic technology to connect the North Hawaii Community Hospital, the Hawaii IPA, and independent physicians, as well as labs, pharmacies, and other care providers.

The chairman and CEO of MMR Information Systems tells an HIT investment forum that the company expects that by year end, over one million people will use MyMedicalRecords PRH and MyESafeDepositBox services. I just wonder who all these people are, since I don’t know anyone who actually maintains a PHR.

The trustees for St. John’s Medical Center (WY) approve a $1.2 million software purchase to expand the hospital’s EMR system. I believe that St. John’s currently uses McKesson’s Paragon. The local paper was a bit short on specifics, but it sounds like St. John’s plans to add e-MAR functionality.

Mr. H is graciously allowing me to take Thursday off. Best wishes if you are celebrating Passover or Easter this week. I’ll be feasting on malted eggs, and if I’m lucky, a dark chocolate bunny.

E-mail Inga.

 View/Print Text Only

March 2010 HIMSS Health IT Venture Fair, a View from the Room

Now that the dust from HIMSS2010 has settled, all the follow-up e-mails sent, and the trinkets and swag carefully filed away, I wanted to delivery my (sorry) overdue thoughts on the Venture Fair that was held on the Sunday before the full festivities got underway. Truthfully, I think Mr. H’s primer on common mistakes was outstanding, but he asked me to share my thoughts from the room and the day in general.

Overall, I think the event was both well done and well organized (though how there turned out not to be enough books which listed the companies and their business summaries was an annoying mystery). I’ll first note that the Venture Fair is primarily sponsored by companies looking to service the attendees, and that’s also how the panels were developed. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, as the would-be entrepreneurs could well benefit from hearing the views of practiced attorneys, bankers or recruiters who can provide critical advice and services to companies of all stages.

A key challenge of the day, however, is that there are really two customers/stakeholders in attendance — entrepreneurs and sources of capital. For the former, I’m sure the three panels were invaluable and I hope they paid close attention to them. For the latter, let’s just say I saw a lot of wandering eyes and smart phones being none-too-surreptitiously used. Financial sponsors were there to see potential investments, and many likely could have been on the panels themselves.

I thought the most interesting and helpful panel was the one that combined entrepreneurs with bankers and lawyers to talk through issues such as types of financing, sources of capital, and how valuations are typically determined. The candor of both the agents (Healthcare Growth Partners) on why or why not to engage them and the entrepreneurs on mistakes they’d made (MEDecision) were thoughtful and sometimes things that can only be learned the hard way (i.e., consider where a potential investor is in their fund’s lifecycle).

A panel discussing legal issues around intellectual property and risk management trended towards the arcane to me (HIPAA galore), but many audience members seemed to find it more relevant. The lunch discussion on how early stage companies can work with the Office of the National Coordinator was also likely helpful for companies interested in dipping their toes into the taxpayer trough for funding.

Bottom line, much of the morning could have been called “An Introduction to Venture Financing 101”, and for most early stage companies, this fairly quick and easy way to gain knowledge about sources of funds, types of investors, use of an agent, and the highly critical difference between terms and valuation (plus the ability to ask questions), was time well spent. I’d encourage entrepreneurs seeking knowledge in these areas to consider attending in the future.

After lunch, with a rousing “Play Ball”, the pitches began. Each company was given the podium and the PowerPoint projector to provide a 15-minute or so introduction to and overview of their business and prospects. Each investor, incidentally, was given a blue dot sticker for their name badges to facilitate the speed dating. After the presentation, the investor left the stage and the room, and in many cases, the swarms of funders followed for outside conversations. I’m sure it was a tough call – “If I follow this guy to impress him and potentially have a call option on funding, do I miss something even better?” I confess I missed a few presentations myself for sidebar chats with friends and colleagues in attendance.

Overall, I have to say the caliber was mixed, as is often the case for events such as this. Rather than comment on all 21, let me hit a few high points directly, a few lower points more obliquely:

• Projections – Show Some Realism. With very few exceptions, the projections were overly aggressive, in some cases approaching absurdity. Yes, I know you’re a growth company, I know investors like to see a “hockey stick” income statement, but in my experience, a bit of realism goes a long way towards establishing credibility. I hope I’m wrong, but I just can’t see the company that projected over $120 million in Year 5 revenues hitting their forecast. Other noteworthy five-year forecasts ranged from $36 million (with 83% EBITDA margins), $42 million, and a company with a product still in alpha reaching $47 million in three years. As Grace said on LA Law, “Goes to credibility your honor”. That said, I actually liked that particular company’s concept and management team.
• · Exit – Be Thoughtful. As a good friend of mine who’s an active banker in the space says, “Where there’s outside capital, there’s a need for liquidity”, and that’s always something both investors and entrepreneurs should bear in mind. This, too, goes to credibility: for example, saying “An investor in [XXX] can expect to see a return of 10 times their investment in three to five years.” Well, maybe they can, depending on the value and terms, but I was surprised to see that very sentence on a page that (as each page did) listed the two sponsoring law firms. Similarly, one company predicted the exit would be via sale to a Fortune 500 HCIT Company. I’ll personally go out on a limb here and say I don’t think McKesson will bite (but again, hope I’m wrong).

Broad Categories – Investors are Careful. Apologies if I sound jaded or am fighting the last war, but I’m sure I’m Little Mr. Sunshine compared to many in the venture community. Here are a few of my views and biases:

• I think the office-based physician market ship has sailed and I’d be loathe to fund a start-up with simply a better mousetrap. I’d want to see significant sales before investing, so friends and family or Angels might be the best road to pursue. Exit will be a challenge. While I maintain EMRs have destroyed more venture dollars than anyone will admit, I confess I’ve been wrong here before (but was right more often).
• I think the RIS/PACS software area is even more difficult. Most of the larger players filled their dance cards during the days when Merge, Amicas, and Emageon were high flyers instead of one small-cap company.
• Maybe I’m missing something, but I’ve yet to see a PHR with a remotely compelling business model. More scarily and interestingly, I’ve yet to meet more than one person who actually uses one. If any readers who use and maintain a PHR for themselves or their family would indicate in the comments section below, I’d be grateful. Incidentally, the concept of sample bias suggests if the readers here don’t, not many random people/patients will.

A Few Stand-Outs. If I had a checkbook, I’d likely want to have a conversation with a few companies. Before naming them, I want to remind readers that: (a) I might have been out of the room chatting with someone or attending to imperatives like coffee, so might have missed the best in show, please don’t be offended if it was you; (b) ST Advisors, LLC has not done business with any of the companies mentioned, but that could change (old banking habits die hard); (c) I’m just a guy with an opinion. I have a space limit of only five so, without further ado and in alphabetical order:

• EDMIS. Despite an absurdly sized booth at HIMSS for a company of its size and focus, I think the ED is an area that needs fixing more than most and point solutions can work particularly well in that environment.
• Logical Images. A unique idea that brings visual diagnostic decision support for clinicians with a subscription model. Projections that appear realistic suggest thoughtful management. Sadly, the company appears to be only seeking strategic investors. I’d pay extra attention to exit, however.
• MedCPU, Inc. Appealing model that “rides on top of existing hospital systems to bring real-time decision support and brings evidence-based medicine to the point-of-care. “ Also a team with a track record, which is always a huge plus in my experience.
• YourNurseIsOn.com. Despite a name that, frankly, reeks of 1999 and projections that I’d dial down, I like businesses that solve a real and difficult problem like the nursing shortage. I saw the company at Health2.0 (where it was also one of the standouts), and like how the story evolves. My primary concern would be around entry barriers (i.e., what’s proprietary about its offering?)
• Prodigo Solutions and Sentient Health. I missed part of their presentations, but I continue to find supply chain and related areas interesting as well. Lots of money floating around, not enough attention being paid, multiple buyers for an exit, and a tendency towards high recurring revenue models all appeal to me.

As ever, thank you for your attention and comments, please drop me a note if there’s a topic you’d like me to address or have questions for Ask the Chair.

Ben Rooks
The Chair

Ben Rooks is the founder of ST Advisors, a strategic consultancy offering long-term and project-relationships to companies and financial sponsors. He earned an MBA in healthcare management from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, has done healthcare IT equity research, and has worked as an investment banker in over 25 successfully closed healthcare and medical technology transactions valued from $40 to $365 million.

 View/Print Text Only

From Lazlo Hollyfeld: “Re: MedPlexus bought by GE. Now granted they likely had a pretty small install base (my bet is 300-350 providers max) but what is going to happen to practices on these ambulatory EMR systems that are inevitably scooped up by larger vendors or more likely left on their own when the tide of HIT stimulus funding inevitably reverse itself in another 18-24 months?”

From In the Cheap Seats: “Re: DocuSys. I hear its was purchased by Merge Healthcare who also bought Eko, a competitive Anesthesia EMR vendor last year. They just finished acquiring Amicas as well.” Not yet announced, but sources tell me the deal for Merge to acquire the Atlanta-based anesthesia systems vendor was signed this weekend. Maybe its tagline was a hint.

From patientsmatter: “Re: Yale-New Haven Health System. I had dinner with an executive clinical leader there last week, where it was said that today the system has three different EMRs in place, but there is a 90% chance they are scrapping them all and choosing Epic.” From my previous reports, it’s almost a done deal if the health system can work out the financial issues.

From Anodyne: “Re: Iowa Health. After more than five years of slogging through a statewide implementation of Allscripts, Iowa Health is changing vendors to the darling, Epic.” Unverified. They were already Epic on the inpatient side, right?

From Consuela: “Re: QuadraMed. Laid of 32 yesterday, mainly accounting and compliance.  Makes sense due to being private and not needing the Sarbanes and SEC stuff and basic accounting functions can be handled by the VC company.” Unverified, but you are right — that would off some relief from the overhead of being a publicly traded company that wouldn’t affect customers anyway.

From Dos Equis: “Re: HIPPA. You have to love that after almost 15 years, Health Data Management misspelled it that way in the survey they sent to readers today.” Not to be overly persnickety, but they also misspelled HITECH right next to it, going lower case for some reason even though it’s an acronym. But it’s probably not the editorial people who created the survey, so I don’t read too much into it.

From UDontKnowme: “Re: Epic’s turnover. The 5% estimate is conservative. Turnover rate, specifically within implementation is well above 5% and is in more to the tune of 15-20%. The average tenure for implementation is about two years. Also, the plan for hiring 500 over the summer is in fact, lower than previous years’ summer hiring plans.”  

From JoseMama: “Re: Peel’s WSJ editorial. It’s valid to critique whether we’re doing enough from a privacy standpoint, but her point of view lacked context. Are your medical records safe on a physical shelf? Or being shuttled around in a truck from facility to facility? And at least when UCLA Medical Center workers looked at Octomom’s medical record, they could track who did it and fire them.”

From Matics: “Re: informatics. You had a post by Indra Neil Sarkar, director of biomedical informatics at the University of Vermont, that ‘There are only about 2,000 to 5,000 of us who are formally certified informaticians.’ Formally certified? Certification in medical informatics does not yet exist. Perhaps he meant postdoctoral trained and/or MS/doctoral degreed?”

  

Picis CEO Todd Cozzens writes an unusually frank criticism of healthcare reform, nearly all of which I find myself agreeing with:

Most of us who live and work in the healthcare world know that something had to be done about the uninsured, the pre-existing condition denial and other key inequalities in our system. What many of us are upset about is that bill that was cobbled together in order to get rushed through ahead of the next election, is not a cohesive, logical plan where increases in care and coverage are met with responsible funding and cost containment. The sum of these parts is an incongruous amalgamation of special interests, one-off provisions, unbridled future costs and somewhere buried deep inside are some good things for patients.

There’s a wealth of information on mobile health over at HIStalk Mobile, where David Brooks is cranking out good information on apps, hardware, and clinical usage. And if you are interested in Regional Extension Centers, find out from several vendor and consultant executives on HIStalk Practice how they expect RECs to change their business and the industry.

 View/Print Text Only

From Soft Sales: “Re: Microsoft Amalga. Robert Seliger, former CEO of Sentillion, will take over sales. This was announced internally on 3/15.” Not exactly, but close. Per my Microsoft contact, former Sentillion president Paul Roscoe will lead the sales organization of Microsoft Health Solutions Group, integrating the sales teams of HSG and its recent Sentillion acquisition. Steve Shihadeh will report to Paul. This is quite interesting — obviously Microsoft had a lot more respect for Sentillion than just buying its single sign-on and context management technologies. Putting someone with healthcare sales experience in charge is a good move if you ask me — we’re not talking shrink-wrapped retail sales here.

From UKnowMe: “Re: CSC. Is it putting itself up for sale? Or at least its healthcare biz?”

From All Hat No Cattle: “Re: NIST. Looks like they are still disregarding system usability.” NIST’s Health IT Standards and Testing page outlines its testing programs, none of which appear to involve usability. Of course, there’s already a measure of that: low adoption.

From OhWell: “Re: Epic installs. UKnowMe is right, Epic is selling like mad. Rumor has it that Epic is looking to hire 500+ people by the end of the summer. So much for experienced implementers or even experienced advisors with the time to focus on each install.” People have been saying for years that Epic, like Cerner and everyone else before it, will eventually hit a wall. It hasn’t happened yet, but competitors are hoping they’ll run out of steam. Of course, they aren’t really doing much to give Epic a run for their money, either.

From Mark Moffitt: “Re: HISsies award for service oriented architecture as the most overrated technology. I’m a big advocate of web services, aka SOA, as a catalyst for change in HCIT. That being said, I have to agree with the award above. Vendors may be embracing SOA under the hood, but very few vendors expose services so customers can take advantage of the technology. As a result, the impact has been muted from a customer perspective. Until vendors make services available to customers and other vendors, like: get_data(patient, med_list) or: go_do_something(patient, order, md), the HCIT public will continue to view SOA as an ‘overrated technology.’ I continue to plead with vendors to expose services. Unfortunately, I  get the response, ‘When customers start demanding it, we will provide it.’ Well, I’m demanding it. How many more have demanded it and gotten the same response? Or they offer it but not to customers, only partners that don’t provide a competing product. The push back I hear from vendors is ‘we don’t want to be held liable.’ Really? If I repair my car and install brakes incorrectly, have an accident and crash into another vehicle, is the victim going to sue Ford, or Toyota, or GMC and win? I don’t think so. A simple release agreement that relieves a vendor of liability is all it takes. I’d like to hear from vendors on this topic.”

Inga’s been busy again, as you’ll see tomorrow when she posts our latest executive Q&A series entry. A dozen or so industry executives answered this question: “Now that the ONC has announced the initial grants for Regional Extension Centers, what will be the effect on EHR selection and implementation for both the industry and your company in particular?”

Listening: Luscious Jackson, reader-recommended, all-female pop with hip-hop influences. Defunct for a few years, but I’m pretty crazy about them.

UCSF names Elazar Harel as vice chancellor for IT and CIO, which includes dotted line responsibility for the CIO of UCSF Medical Center, fresh off a failed Centricity implementation.

Dave Garets and Mike Davis, the two top guys at HIMSS Analytics, start their new gigs with The Advisory Board Company on Monday. HIMSS says it will replace them.

Richard Ferrans MD, CMIO of Memorial Hospital of Gulfport (MS) will talk about the Mississippi Coastal HIE in a Medicity Webinar on Wednesday, April 14.

DEA publishes an Interim Final Rule on e-prescribing of controlled drugs (warning: it’s a 334-page PDF). There’s the usual 60-day comment period. I haven’t studied it yet, but if anyone wants to summarize whatever is interesting in all those pages, feel free to send me your thoughts.

Researchers in France begin a project to identify patients at risk for hospital-acquired infections by scanning electronic medical records with a Xerox text mining tool called FactSpotter.

Sisters of Charity Health System (OH) names Robin Stursa to the newly created position of VP/CIO. She was previously at Saint Vincent Health System (PA).

An opinion piece by Deborah Peel, MD of Patient Privacy Rights called Your Medical Records Aren’t Secure runs in the Wall Street Journal.

There is no need to choose between the benefits of technology and our rights to health privacy. Technologies already exist that enable each person to choose what information he is willing to share and what must remain private. Consent must be built into electronic systems up front so we can each choose the levels of privacy and sharing we prefer. My organization, Patient Privacy Rights, is starting a Do Not Disclose petition so Americans can inform Congress and the president they want to control who can see and use their medical records. We believe Congress should pass a law to build an online registry where individuals can express their preferences for sharing their health information or keeping it private. Such a registry, plus safety technologies for online records, will mean Americans can trust electronic health systems.

Bonnie Siegel, formerly of Dorenfest and Hersher Associates, joins HIT executive search firm Sanford Rose Associates.

UC Irvine researchers are developing Telios, a Web-based telepresence system that will offer videoconferencing and remote patient monitoring tools.

Ironic beneficiaries of healthcare reform: offshore business process outsourcers, which are even more attractive when administrative cost-cutting gets serious.

A tidbit from the trial of the former CEO of University Medical Center (NV), accused of squandering $11 million on no-bid contracts: one contractor got $850K for producing a 30-minute PowerPoint describing an IT system the hospital already owned.

Red Hat announces Q4 numbers: revenue up 18%, EPS $0.12 vs. $0.08.

E-mail me.

HERtalk by Inga

Earlier this week, Mr. H mentioned that The Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences and its former president are suing one another. A local paper points out that former president Karen Pletz is now better known than she was before the firing. That’s because there are plenty of people (like me) who are drawn to the salacious aspects of the story. On the one hand, we have the medical school, which claims Pletz abused her expense account, racking up $2.3 million in food and travel charges.Then we have Pletz, who counters that she’s a victim of conspiracy, aimed at making her the scapegoat for a board that was paying her a huge salary ($1.2 million a year) and approving hefty entertainment expenses. Someone’s hiding something and it all makes for a juicy trial.

Another not-for-profit hospital system agrees to be acquired and transformed to a for-profit entity. Caritas Christi Health Care says that private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management is buying the six-hospital system for $830 million, which includes $430 million to pay off debt and $400 million on major improvements, such as upgrades to IT systems.

Masonicare Healthcare Center (CT) agrees to deploy MED3OOO’s InteGreat EHR for the physicians serving its facility.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center selects Accelarad’s SeeMyRadiology.com service, giving orthopedic surgeons the ability to exchange medical images in real-time via the Web or a mobile device.

Allocade, a developer of patient flow software, closes a $5 million round of VC financing led by VantagePoint Venture. Allocade intends to use the money to expand operations to meet the increased demand for its On-Cue solution.

The ONC appoints Aaron McKethan and Craig Brammer as the new program director and deputy director of its Beacon communities project. The project will award about 15 grants to non-profit organizations or government bodies to help them achieve meaningful use of their EHRs. McKethan is a research director at the Brookings Institution’s Engelber Center for Health Reform and Brammer is a project director at Cincinnati’s Aligning Forces for Quality.

CareTech Solutions and ForeSee Results announce they’ve formed a strategic partnership to provide CareTech’s hospital clients with an online customer satisfaction measurement and monitoring tool.

ICA vice president John Tempesco is named a Fellow of the American College of Healthcare Executives.

Sermo and athenahealth release results from a Physician Sentiment Index that indicates doctors aren’t too happy with the business of medicine. A couple of the more disturbing findings: 59% of physicians think the quality of medicine will decline in the next five years and 64% agree their clinical decisions are being based more on what payors are willing to cover than what they think is best for their patients. Sermo CEO Dr. Daniel Palestrant explains the results in more detail in this CNBC interview.

March 25th is National Medical Biller’s Day, according to the American Medical Billing Association. Thank you, billers, for keeping the money flowing!

Sixteen Harris County Hospital District employees who were fired for HIPAA violations in November get their jobs back. Hospital district administrators reassessed the intent of the violation and reinstated the workers’ jobs, though no back wages will be paid. The firings occurred after one of hospital’s medical residents was shot in a grocery store parking and became a patient at the hospital. The medical resident survived.

GE acquires MedPlexus, an EMR PM vendor that targets the 1-10 physician practice market. My first thought was why would GE make this purchase given that they already have the Centricity product? However, if I recall my ambulatory EMR history correctly, Centricity EMR is not truly integrated with a practice management product, but interfaces with either the Centricity Practice Solution (the old Millbrook product) or Centricity Enterprise (the old IDX software). MedPlexus, however, appears to be a fully integrated PM / EMR / patient portal solution. It’s also a hosted product, which is possibly a more attractive and affordable solution than GE’s traditional client/server options. And, Centricity EMR has not had stellar KLAS ratings in the last couple of years, so perhaps GE needed a fresh option.

CentraState Healthcare System (NJ) contracts with Design Clinicals to implement MedsTracker patient medication management. CentraState went live December 7th and says they’ve cut medication reconciliation time from about three minutes to one minute 38 seconds.

Dell unveils its Medical Archiving Solution, which is based on its upcoming Dell DX Object Storage Platform. Dell hopes the new technology will appeal to hospitals needing to increase storage for growing EMR and digital imaging systems.

Huntsville Hospital (AL) selects MedAssets’ RCM solutions for claims management and claims audit and resolution.

E-mail Inga.

 View/Print Text Only