<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Morning Update 10/5/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://histalk2.com/2009/10/04/monday-morning-update-10509/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/10/04/monday-morning-update-10509/</link>
	<description>Healthcare IT News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:45:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. M</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/10/04/monday-morning-update-10509/comment-page-1/#comment-6010</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/2009/10/04/monday-morning-update-10509/#comment-6010</guid>
		<description>Google Sidewiki . . . that&#039;s scary.  So now anyone can visit any website and post comments or added content to someone else&#039;s website?  That seems a violation of owning and managing the content of your own website.  Now anyone can come along and post anything they want on your website.  Reading Google&#039;s proposed uses for this tool is even scarier in that they suggest people add medical content to sites like the CDC - Who&#039;s validating the accuracy of that content?  Who&#039;s responsible for anyone acting on that content?  What if someone dies as a result of misinformation?

I can think of all kinds of inappropriate uses from a business competition perspective that makes this tool a potential major problem, but from the medical perspective, owners of web pages must be given the right and capability to selectively enable or disable this feature for their website.  If Google doesn&#039;t provide that, I see lawsuits in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Sidewiki . . . that&#8217;s scary.  So now anyone can visit any website and post comments or added content to someone else&#8217;s website?  That seems a violation of owning and managing the content of your own website.  Now anyone can come along and post anything they want on your website.  Reading Google&#8217;s proposed uses for this tool is even scarier in that they suggest people add medical content to sites like the CDC &#8211; Who&#8217;s validating the accuracy of that content?  Who&#8217;s responsible for anyone acting on that content?  What if someone dies as a result of misinformation?</p>
<p>I can think of all kinds of inappropriate uses from a business competition perspective that makes this tool a potential major problem, but from the medical perspective, owners of web pages must be given the right and capability to selectively enable or disable this feature for their website.  If Google doesn&#8217;t provide that, I see lawsuits in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT.EHR.OHMYGOSH</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/10/04/monday-morning-update-10509/comment-page-1/#comment-6005</link>
		<dc:creator>IT.EHR.OHMYGOSH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/2009/10/04/monday-morning-update-10509/#comment-6005</guid>
		<description>Allscripts new implementation might have cut their time by 50% but the customers are picking up that time 10 fold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allscripts new implementation might have cut their time by 50% but the customers are picking up that time 10 fold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corpuscle</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/10/04/monday-morning-update-10509/comment-page-1/#comment-5998</link>
		<dc:creator>corpuscle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/2009/10/04/monday-morning-update-10509/#comment-5998</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Discovere modules include biobanking, research registries, public health investigator workflow, clinical trials management, and adverse event reporting.&quot;
Turn this module on to the company&#039;s Millenium Patient Care products since the vast vat of adverse events are not beingt addressed as reported at Barts in the UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Discovere modules include biobanking, research registries, public health investigator workflow, clinical trials management, and adverse event reporting.&#8221;<br />
Turn this module on to the company&#8217;s Millenium Patient Care products since the vast vat of adverse events are not beingt addressed as reported at Barts in the UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SkinnyIT</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/10/04/monday-morning-update-10509/comment-page-1/#comment-5996</link>
		<dc:creator>SkinnyIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/2009/10/04/monday-morning-update-10509/#comment-5996</guid>
		<description>Re: A reader asked if GE is still selling Centricity Lab in the UK. Inga asked GE and we appreciate their response: “The business has decided to shift its strategy away from forward production on the Centricity Lab product. The demand for it is, perhaps, as strong as ever yet currently concentrated in smaller, community-based EMR settings. We really need to focus on maximizing the personalized service we can deliver to the existing install base and will continue to service and support all current installs (as well as honoring all current orders).” 

Do you know if this applies to all Centricity Lab products? (TriWin and Ultra?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: A reader asked if GE is still selling Centricity Lab in the UK. Inga asked GE and we appreciate their response: “The business has decided to shift its strategy away from forward production on the Centricity Lab product. The demand for it is, perhaps, as strong as ever yet currently concentrated in smaller, community-based EMR settings. We really need to focus on maximizing the personalized service we can deliver to the existing install base and will continue to service and support all current installs (as well as honoring all current orders).” </p>
<p>Do you know if this applies to all Centricity Lab products? (TriWin and Ultra?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PezMan</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/10/04/monday-morning-update-10509/comment-page-1/#comment-5995</link>
		<dc:creator>PezMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/2009/10/04/monday-morning-update-10509/#comment-5995</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it be easier if we just wore tin foil on our heads and stayed in bunkers?  Do we have proof of any of these claims?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be easier if we just wore tin foil on our heads and stayed in bunkers?  Do we have proof of any of these claims?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

