<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News 10/2/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://histalk2.com/2009/10/01/news-10209/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/10/01/news-10209/</link>
	<description>Healthcare IT News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:45:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Programmer</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/10/01/news-10209/comment-page-1/#comment-5983</link>
		<dc:creator>Programmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 02:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/?p=3027#comment-5983</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Of course, availability of lousy “data” will make another secondary use attractive: sham peer review against doctors that hospital management doesn’t like:

You can&#039;t even show that hospital IT systems are collecting bad data, nevermind that it will be used to get rid of anyone.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Of course, availability of lousy “data” will make another secondary use attractive: sham peer review against doctors that hospital management doesn’t like:</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t even show that hospital IT systems are collecting bad data, nevermind that it will be used to get rid of anyone.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/10/01/news-10209/comment-page-1/#comment-5982</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 01:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/?p=3027#comment-5982</guid>
		<description>Of course, availability of lousy &quot;data&quot; will make another secondary use attractive:  sham peer review against doctors that hospital management doesn&#039;t like:

http://www.jpands.org/vol14no3/huntoon.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, availability of lousy &#8220;data&#8221; will make another secondary use attractive:  sham peer review against doctors that hospital management doesn&#8217;t like:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jpands.org/vol14no3/huntoon.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.jpands.org/vol14no3/huntoon.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Bradford</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/10/01/news-10209/comment-page-1/#comment-5972</link>
		<dc:creator>William Bradford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/?p=3027#comment-5972</guid>
		<description>Noah you&#039;re right, more propaganda for the HIT vendors..certainly automation of the health care process/EMR&#039;s has no value for patient care and clinical practice, patient safety, efficiency or cost effectiveness.  The paper system  everyone operated under worked so well before..if it wasn&#039;t broke why try to fix it with this new fangled technoblah blah...

I&#039;m tired of physicians complaints about automation and its evils.  Propaganda?? How about real life examples of the benefits of well designed and well implemented technology solutions.  There are bad cars on the road and the people that drive them just like there are bad technology solutions and the uneducated who waste money and time on purchasing and implementing them.

Noah you are so very right...why would anyone ever want to turn their horse and buggy in for one of them new fangled horseless carriages!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noah you&#8217;re right, more propaganda for the HIT vendors..certainly automation of the health care process/EMR&#8217;s has no value for patient care and clinical practice, patient safety, efficiency or cost effectiveness.  The paper system  everyone operated under worked so well before..if it wasn&#8217;t broke why try to fix it with this new fangled technoblah blah&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m tired of physicians complaints about automation and its evils.  Propaganda?? How about real life examples of the benefits of well designed and well implemented technology solutions.  There are bad cars on the road and the people that drive them just like there are bad technology solutions and the uneducated who waste money and time on purchasing and implementing them.</p>
<p>Noah you are so very right&#8230;why would anyone ever want to turn their horse and buggy in for one of them new fangled horseless carriages!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Programmer</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/10/01/news-10209/comment-page-1/#comment-5969</link>
		<dc:creator>Programmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/?p=3027#comment-5969</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Garbage in and garbage out will hardly improve outcomes. The EMR reports are chock full of useless information and dummy diagnoses to enable upcoding. Pathetic and delusional ideas, above.
&lt;/i&gt;

Suzie RN, are you aware that the &quot;useless&quot; reports where you work might not be indicative of the entire EMR market?   As for &quot;upcoding&quot;, I assume that any hospitals which regularly upcode are already aware that their stats are not valid.  They are probably in the &quot;less than one quarter&quot; of healthcare executives surveyed who don&#039;t expect the secondary use of EMR data will be their organization’s greatest asset over the next five years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Garbage in and garbage out will hardly improve outcomes. The EMR reports are chock full of useless information and dummy diagnoses to enable upcoding. Pathetic and delusional ideas, above.<br />
</i></p>
<p>Suzie RN, are you aware that the &#8220;useless&#8221; reports where you work might not be indicative of the entire EMR market?   As for &#8220;upcoding&#8221;, I assume that any hospitals which regularly upcode are already aware that their stats are not valid.  They are probably in the &#8220;less than one quarter&#8221; of healthcare executives surveyed who don&#8217;t expect the secondary use of EMR data will be their organization’s greatest asset over the next five years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hitgal</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/10/01/news-10209/comment-page-1/#comment-5968</link>
		<dc:creator>hitgal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/?p=3027#comment-5968</guid>
		<description>How can Allscripts go wrong?  Glen advises the President on HIT. Did Glen also make a pitch for the Olympics to be in Chicago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can Allscripts go wrong?  Glen advises the President on HIT. Did Glen also make a pitch for the Olympics to be in Chicago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

