<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From HIMSS 4/7/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://histalk2.com/2009/04/08/from-himss-4709/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/04/08/from-himss-4709/</link>
	<description>Healthcare IT News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:25:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpeechRec trainer</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/04/08/from-himss-4709/comment-page-1/#comment-3935</link>
		<dc:creator>SpeechRec trainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 08:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/2009/04/08/from-himss-4709/#comment-3935</guid>
		<description>I will agree that as a technology the inherent value of speech recognition may have been overstated, but as a component of a medical transcription software and service, done well, it has great value.  I&#039;ve only been around fora few years but in that time I have personally witnessed computer aided medical transcription become a real source of time and dollar savings for the work of medical transcription.  I&#039;ll admit that all my experience in the industry has been for the first in KLAS speech rec company and so I am perhaps predisposed to think and say so...but still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will agree that as a technology the inherent value of speech recognition may have been overstated, but as a component of a medical transcription software and service, done well, it has great value.  I&#8217;ve only been around fora few years but in that time I have personally witnessed computer aided medical transcription become a real source of time and dollar savings for the work of medical transcription.  I&#8217;ll admit that all my experience in the industry has been for the first in KLAS speech rec company and so I am perhaps predisposed to think and say so&#8230;but still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OverdoseAlert</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/04/08/from-himss-4709/comment-page-1/#comment-3934</link>
		<dc:creator>OverdoseAlert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/2009/04/08/from-himss-4709/#comment-3934</guid>
		<description>One fellow walked by our booth....he had ribbons starting at his chest and linked all the way to his kneecap...
very colorful....I suppose everyone was contributing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One fellow walked by our booth&#8230;.he had ribbons starting at his chest and linked all the way to his kneecap&#8230;<br />
very colorful&#8230;.I suppose everyone was contributing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John@chilmark</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/04/08/from-himss-4709/comment-page-1/#comment-3933</link>
		<dc:creator>John@chilmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/2009/04/08/from-himss-4709/#comment-3933</guid>
		<description>Mr HIStalk, 
You are almost always accurate but stating that &quot;certified EHR&quot; automatically means CCHIT certified could not be more wrong. No where in the legislation is CCHIT mentioned, though the CCHIT folks and their suuporters certain infer otherwise. 

Hopefully, wiser minds will realize what you states above that CCHIT certification would put a sword into the heart of innovation, but maybe that has already happened as I saw little true innovation on display at HIMSS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr HIStalk,<br />
You are almost always accurate but stating that &#8220;certified EHR&#8221; automatically means CCHIT certified could not be more wrong. No where in the legislation is CCHIT mentioned, though the CCHIT folks and their suuporters certain infer otherwise. </p>
<p>Hopefully, wiser minds will realize what you states above that CCHIT certification would put a sword into the heart of innovation, but maybe that has already happened as I saw little true innovation on display at HIMSS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bulb man</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/04/08/from-himss-4709/comment-page-1/#comment-3931</link>
		<dc:creator>bulb man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/2009/04/08/from-himss-4709/#comment-3931</guid>
		<description>duuude:
Mr. H doesn&#039;t have to defend his feelings towards GE, afterall it&#039;s his blog and it is just an opinion.  I&#039;m sure there is a reason for the dislike of the company and it could very well be the enterprise things you mentioned.

To be honest my knowledge of the enterprise side isn&#039;t so strong with GE.  I&#039;m more a follower of Logician/MedicalLogic applications, which I believe are doing well in the market.

anonymous:
You can pretty much say that about any company.  (MSFT, Misys, MCK, etc)
&quot;(insert here) - where good products go to die&quot;

[From Mr. HIStalk] Just to clarify, the genesis of this discussion was the HISsies, nominated by and voted on by readers. My opinions toward GE (which I admit are mostly negative) really didn&#039;t play into that result. And when I voted with my one vote, I didn&#039;t vote for them as the worst vendor on that list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>duuude:<br />
Mr. H doesn&#8217;t have to defend his feelings towards GE, afterall it&#8217;s his blog and it is just an opinion.  I&#8217;m sure there is a reason for the dislike of the company and it could very well be the enterprise things you mentioned.</p>
<p>To be honest my knowledge of the enterprise side isn&#8217;t so strong with GE.  I&#8217;m more a follower of Logician/MedicalLogic applications, which I believe are doing well in the market.</p>
<p>anonymous:<br />
You can pretty much say that about any company.  (MSFT, Misys, MCK, etc)<br />
&#8220;(insert here) &#8211; where good products go to die&#8221;</p>
<p>[From Mr. HIStalk] Just to clarify, the genesis of this discussion was the HISsies, nominated by and voted on by readers. My opinions toward GE (which I admit are mostly negative) really didn&#8217;t play into that result. And when I voted with my one vote, I didn&#8217;t vote for them as the worst vendor on that list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2009/04/08/from-himss-4709/comment-page-1/#comment-3930</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/2009/04/08/from-himss-4709/#comment-3930</guid>
		<description>I heard the following from a former GE employee - &quot;GE - where all good products go to die&quot; - a little harsh, but there&#039;s some truth to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard the following from a former GE employee &#8211; &#8220;GE &#8211; where all good products go to die&#8221; &#8211; a little harsh, but there&#8217;s some truth to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

