<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Morning Update 10/15/07</title>
	<atom:link href="http://histalk2.com/2007/10/14/monday-morning-update101507/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://histalk2.com/2007/10/14/monday-morning-update101507/</link>
	<description>Healthcare IT News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:41:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam Godwin</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2007/10/14/monday-morning-update101507/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Godwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/2007/10/14/monday-morning-update101507/#comment-322</guid>
		<description>Lauren Graham: .....A number of us are unsure if we should adopt a standard solution or promote multiple alternatives and if we should provide the hosting. Also, no one has a perfect solution for handling physicians who already have EMRs.”


Axolotl has a solution that allows results to be delivered from any Hospital EMR to any and all EMRs.  For physician practices that do not currently use EMRs results are delivered a very low cost EMR Lite.  This EdgeServer and EMR Lite combination is fitting into existing environments as well as fueling new connectivity initiatives by Hospital Systems ... Contact Sam @ Axolotl for more information</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lauren Graham: &#8230;..A number of us are unsure if we should adopt a standard solution or promote multiple alternatives and if we should provide the hosting. Also, no one has a perfect solution for handling physicians who already have EMRs.”</p>
<p>Axolotl has a solution that allows results to be delivered from any Hospital EMR to any and all EMRs.  For physician practices that do not currently use EMRs results are delivered a very low cost EMR Lite.  This EdgeServer and EMR Lite combination is fitting into existing environments as well as fueling new connectivity initiatives by Hospital Systems &#8230; Contact Sam @ Axolotl for more information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Levin</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2007/10/14/monday-morning-update101507/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>David Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/2007/10/14/monday-morning-update101507/#comment-320</guid>
		<description>As the vp of marketing at MEDSEEK I&#039;ve read with interest the various posts regarding HealthVault and its potential impact on information sharing and improved personal health decisions.  MEDSEEK is one of the few health IT vendors to participate in the launch of the platform, and we can firmly submit that Microsoft has indeed built a platform for its ecosystem to build upon.

MEDSEEK is working with its hospital partners to determine how best to leverage this platform in improving the experience their patients&#039; have with the organization. It&#039;s certainly not perfect, but it&#039;s a start and Microsoft has publicly stated they have the patience and financial resources to see this through. Time will tell, but we&#039;re optimistic.

MedStar Health, with our help, is one of the first health systems to leverage this platform and is offering select cardiology patients the ability to view, store, and share their discharge summaries as they continue their care in the community. Working with Microsoft&#039;s published API, we’ve created a patient-centric application that enables patients to take better control of their information - storing it in their personal HealthVault account while also sharing it with care coordinators, physicians, and visiting nurses through the MedStar patient portal.

Through this model, patients are at the center and, those who are interested and able, can be more active participants in their wellness, not passive observers. Based on this experience, we are working with other hospitals to leverage this platform within their own communities and their continued interest is validating. Hospital executives are realizing the patient&#039;s experience is influenced well before and after their inpatient encounter, and are taking steps and learning lessons of other industries to create a differentiated service offering and positive experience with every touch.  There is still much to be done, but at least we&#039;re starting.

As an early entrant to the hospital portal market, we&#039;ve seen a massive migration from &#039;brochure-ware&#039; sites to integrated portals that aggregate consumer and patient information while enabling visitors to interact with the organization in a meaningful way. Hospitals are no longer viewing their web properties as simple promotional vehicles, but as a channel to deploy their patient acquisition and retention strategies, engage and communicate with physicians, improve clinical and business processes, and enable employees to collaborate. Essentially, they are investing in the medium like other industries have in the past. 

Certainly MEDSEEK has much to gain from this trend and our continued evangelism is paying off, but ultimately hospitals and their patients have the most to gain.

Hospitals are beginning to recognize the transformative nature their Web experience can have on their community, patient, and physician partners.  Early leaders like MedStar Health, Henry Ford, Iowa Health, Edward Health, Delnor Community, Alegent Health, Mount Carmel, and many others are showing the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the vp of marketing at MEDSEEK I&#8217;ve read with interest the various posts regarding HealthVault and its potential impact on information sharing and improved personal health decisions.  MEDSEEK is one of the few health IT vendors to participate in the launch of the platform, and we can firmly submit that Microsoft has indeed built a platform for its ecosystem to build upon.</p>
<p>MEDSEEK is working with its hospital partners to determine how best to leverage this platform in improving the experience their patients&#8217; have with the organization. It&#8217;s certainly not perfect, but it&#8217;s a start and Microsoft has publicly stated they have the patience and financial resources to see this through. Time will tell, but we&#8217;re optimistic.</p>
<p>MedStar Health, with our help, is one of the first health systems to leverage this platform and is offering select cardiology patients the ability to view, store, and share their discharge summaries as they continue their care in the community. Working with Microsoft&#8217;s published API, we’ve created a patient-centric application that enables patients to take better control of their information &#8211; storing it in their personal HealthVault account while also sharing it with care coordinators, physicians, and visiting nurses through the MedStar patient portal.</p>
<p>Through this model, patients are at the center and, those who are interested and able, can be more active participants in their wellness, not passive observers. Based on this experience, we are working with other hospitals to leverage this platform within their own communities and their continued interest is validating. Hospital executives are realizing the patient&#8217;s experience is influenced well before and after their inpatient encounter, and are taking steps and learning lessons of other industries to create a differentiated service offering and positive experience with every touch.  There is still much to be done, but at least we&#8217;re starting.</p>
<p>As an early entrant to the hospital portal market, we&#8217;ve seen a massive migration from &#8216;brochure-ware&#8217; sites to integrated portals that aggregate consumer and patient information while enabling visitors to interact with the organization in a meaningful way. Hospitals are no longer viewing their web properties as simple promotional vehicles, but as a channel to deploy their patient acquisition and retention strategies, engage and communicate with physicians, improve clinical and business processes, and enable employees to collaborate. Essentially, they are investing in the medium like other industries have in the past. </p>
<p>Certainly MEDSEEK has much to gain from this trend and our continued evangelism is paying off, but ultimately hospitals and their patients have the most to gain.</p>
<p>Hospitals are beginning to recognize the transformative nature their Web experience can have on their community, patient, and physician partners.  Early leaders like MedStar Health, Henry Ford, Iowa Health, Edward Health, Delnor Community, Alegent Health, Mount Carmel, and many others are showing the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sailforme</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2007/10/14/monday-morning-update101507/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>sailforme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/2007/10/14/monday-morning-update101507/#comment-312</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have any insights on the value of the upcoming &quot;Communications Collaborative for Health IT&quot; in Beverly Hills on November 5-6?  Please send a note with your comments.  Also, have you heard about the mobile phone PHR capability from a company called Diversinet that sits on top of healthvault, WebMD, HAZ, and other PHR platforms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have any insights on the value of the upcoming &#8220;Communications Collaborative for Health IT&#8221; in Beverly Hills on November 5-6?  Please send a note with your comments.  Also, have you heard about the mobile phone PHR capability from a company called Diversinet that sits on top of healthvault, WebMD, HAZ, and other PHR platforms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Weider</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2007/10/14/monday-morning-update101507/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Weider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/2007/10/14/monday-morning-update101507/#comment-310</guid>
		<description>I was going to go to CHIME.  But, my suit was at the cleaners and I did not want to read about how I upset someone by dressing improperly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to go to CHIME.  But, my suit was at the cleaners and I did not want to read about how I upset someone by dressing improperly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazlo Stanfield</title>
		<link>http://histalk2.com/2007/10/14/monday-morning-update101507/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazlo Stanfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://histalk2.com/2007/10/14/monday-morning-update101507/#comment-308</guid>
		<description>I agree with what Stifler mostly says about the potential Google-WebMD merger.  However, I find it highly unlikely that  Google would be able to duplicate WebMD&#039;s cite in a week.  More importantly, it would take Google some time to build WebMD brand recognition with consumers.    

 Google is relevant right now in health IT because of health-related search.  Google cares about eyeballs and ad revenues.  Same for Yahoo.  Talk a nice game but until they make a large acquisition of a firm with a &quot;killer app&quot; (most overused term in Health IT due to its complexity and hiccups) or devote a lot more development people to health IT, they will pretty much be on the periphery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with what Stifler mostly says about the potential Google-WebMD merger.  However, I find it highly unlikely that  Google would be able to duplicate WebMD&#8217;s cite in a week.  More importantly, it would take Google some time to build WebMD brand recognition with consumers.    </p>
<p> Google is relevant right now in health IT because of health-related search.  Google cares about eyeballs and ad revenues.  Same for Yahoo.  Talk a nice game but until they make a large acquisition of a firm with a &#8220;killer app&#8221; (most overused term in Health IT due to its complexity and hiccups) or devote a lot more development people to health IT, they will pretty much be on the periphery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
